[governance] Recent briefing in NY on IGF review

[Eric Dierker]

I think you have some salient points here Ginger but I take the liberty of bastardizing them to make my point. Mine in Italics. Of course my views are in the extreme here to give them "emphasis".


--- On Sat, 4/10/10, Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com> wrote:


....we do not have a clear direction on a statement theme. Statement Theme? Why not simply a statement?*  Can we take this opportunity to focus our priorities and move forward? This seems backwards - should governance be about creating priorities - or addressing them?

There have been some excellent discussions lately. Please post your concrete ideas How about just stop there. Posting concrete ideas, is or should be a goal in itself for issue(s) to address. I suggest we choose one or two ideas for strong emphasis, rather than making a general statement. It does seem more effective. Agreed here but we probably should just dedicate more time to Ideas -- Let others take emphasis

Ideas?
Best, Ginger
*Themes indicate fittling in,, not exploring new or thinking outside.





 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100410/6e97ddb2/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t