[governance] US Court Rules against FCC in 'Net Neutrality' Case

Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com
Wed Apr 7 17:49:00 EDT 2010


Thank you Keerti, I managed to get it of the NY Times link as well.
But thank you just the same. I would be interested to know what the
hierarchy of the COurt system is in the US, particularly whether FCC
can appeal again.

I will go through the judgment and see whether there was any point dissented?

Sala




On 4/7/10, Keerti Nagappa <keerti.nagappa at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Salanieta,
>
> Have attached a copy of the case.
>
>
> On 6 April 2010 19:28, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <
> salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Keerti. Do you have a copy of the Judgment?
>>
>> Sala
>> On 4/7/10, Keerti Nagappa <keerti.nagappa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > A federal appeals court (US) has ruled that the Federal
>> > Communications Commission (FCC)lacks the authority to require
>> > broadband providers to give equal treatment to all Internet
>> > traffic flowing over their networks.
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/technology/07net.html?hp
>> >
>> > *Court Rules Against F.C.C. in ‘Net Neutrality’ Case*
>> > <
>> http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/technology&pos=Frame4A&sn2=d59993d0/2e9a4d4e&sn1=54576ea3/a621c698&camp=foxsearch2010_emailtools_1225557c_nyt5&ad=ch_02_120x60anim_10k&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Fcrazyheart
>> >
>> >
>> > WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court has ruled that the Federal
>> > Communications
>> > Commission<
>> http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/f/federal_communications_commission/index.html?inline=nyt-org
>> >lacks
>> > the authority to require broadband providers to give equal treatment
>> > to all Internet traffic flowing over their networks.
>> >
>> > Tuesday’s ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the District
>> of
>> > Columbia is a big victory for the Comcast
>> > Corporation<
>> http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/comcast_corporation/index.html?inline=nyt-org
>> >,
>> > the nation’s largest cable company. It had challenged the FCC’s
>> > authority
>> to
>> > impose so called “net
>> > neutrality<
>> http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/subjects/n/net_neutrality/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier
>> >”
>> > obligations.
>> >
>> > It marks a serious setback for the F.C.C., which needs authority to
>> regulate
>> > the Internet in order to push ahead with key parts of its national
>> broadband
>> > plan.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Keerti Nagappa
>> > LLM Candidate 2010
>> > University of California,
>> > Berkeley School of Law
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Salanieta Tudrau Tamanikaiwaimaro
>> P.O.Box 17862
>> Suva
>> Fiji Islands
>>
>> Cell: +679 9982851
>> Alternate Email: s.tamanikaiwaimaro at tfl.com.fj
>>
>> "Wisdom is far better than riches."
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Keerti Nagappa
> LLM Candidate 2010
> University of California,
> Berkeley School of Law
>


-- 
Salanieta Tudrau Tamanikaiwaimaro
P.O.Box 17862
Suva
Fiji Islands

Cell: +679 9982851
Alternate Email: s.tamanikaiwaimaro at tfl.com.fj

"Wisdom is far better than riches."
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list