[governance] Clinton Admits: "Free" Trade is Harmful to 3rd

[McTim]

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
> McTim
>
> You seriously believe ICANN is a civil society organisation!?

of course I do, because it is.

>
> Apart from the many other absurdities implied, you mentioned in your email
> to Milton that allocation of domain name, IP addresses etc is  a 'natural
> monopoly' function. Dont you see that civil society is definitionally a
> social sub-system denoting pluralism, non-rivalrous-ness, non-monopoly
> etc.... How could an organisation do a 'natural monopoly' function and be
> civil society?

the two are not at all mutually exclusive.

Do you deny that the root of Internet numbering resources are a
natural monopoly?  How about names?  If it wasn't then I could have
itforchange.net, and there would be chaos in terms of who is who.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t