[governance] Clinton Admits: "Free" Trade is Harmful to 3rd World

Sun Apr 4 16:18:05 EDT 2010

I have been reading these discussions with much interest. Trade
liberalisation affects ICT development in the region. Southern Cross
is soon to have a new competitor in the Pacific Fibre (see details in
Fiji Islands Business page 10 April 2010 issue - available online).

Trade liberalisation also impacts in numerous ways:-

a) cost of technology and services - which has a flow on effect onto
the consumers and even if regulators started putting price celings,
lack  of comprehensive analysis means that this could also affect
existing telco operators capacity to build their own broadband
infrastructure as resources would have to be prioritised;
b)issues of standardisation arises as the Pacific has poor
"Anti-dumping" measures due to ill-developed capacity locally - poor
border control enforcement and surveillance etc etc

Here's a paper on the impact of trade liberalisation on Forum Island
Countries in the Pacific:

http://www.forumsec.org/resources/uploads/attachments/documents/Revenue%20consequences%20of%20Trade%20Liberalisation1.pdf

http://www.forumsec.org/resources/uploads/attachments/documents/PICTA%20RoO%20Manual3.pdf

http://www.forumsec.org/resources/uploads/attachments/documents/PICTA.pdf

http://www.forumsec.org/resources/uploads/attachments/documents/PACER.pdf

http://www.forumsec.org/resources/uploads/attachments/documents/FAQs%20PICTA%20PACER.pdf

On 4/5/10, William Drake <william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch> wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>>
>> On 4 Apr 2010, at 07:24, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway, right now the recent Obama government's decision to reduce
>>> barriers to ethanol imports is meeting severe resistance from US corn
>>> farmers. Any similar attempt regarding other crops will have similar
>>> reactions, and basically nothing is new on this and nothing will change,
>>> remorseful discourses aside. Europe is of course no exception.
>>
>>
>> just checking because i do not know, what are Brazil's policies regarding
>> the protection of its farmers and industries?
>
> Brazil and India have refused to liberalize their manufacturing and services
> sectors in exchange for agricultural concessions to the extent the US and
> Europe consider necessary in order to be able to sell a deal at home
> (particularly given that the US has already lost most of its industrial base
> and has had whole cities/states gutted).  Competition from China being a if
> not the principle concern in manufacturing.
>>
>> also i think it is easy to condemn other countries for such behavior, but
>> when masses of people are unemployed and homeless, despite the fact that
>> rich manufacturers and agribusiness are raking in the billions, the issue
>> is slightly more complex then US and Europe are bad.
>
> Slightly...
>
> The geometry of interest alignments and misalignments across countries and
> sectors may have become unworkable for a universal model.  There's a lot of
> concern in Geneva trade circles that the old architecture of broad based
> multilateral liberalization cannot deepen, and that discriminatory bilateral
> and plurilateral deals will be the default.
>
>> also when the business leaders in the developing world are exploiting
>> their workers and using child labor in many case to enable their
>> capitalists to get rich, were does the motivation come from?
>>
>> this your country bad, my country good stuff is not going to get us very
>> far - though it does help the owners of our repspective countries a bunch.
>
> and feels good.
>
> BTW there are some important implications for people interested in IG too.
> There's a whole complex of negotiations concerning telecom, Internet
> commerce, and ICT-related goods and services that have been underway for
> over a decade, since before the Doha Round began.  If the round fails the
> bits of interest to key industries will become the focus of renewed efforts
> to cut exclusive deals, the moratorium on applying customs duties to
> cross-border intangile transactions probably goes out the window, and so on.
>
> Cheers
>
> Bill____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-- 
Salanieta Tudrau Tamanikaiwaimaro
P.O.Box 17862
Suva
Fiji Islands

Cell: +679 9982851
Alternate Email: s.tamanikaiwaimaro at tfl.com.fj

"Wisdom is far better than riches."
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t