[governance] Results of charter amendment vote

[Avri Doria]

On 28 Sep 2009, at 15:47, Roland Perry wrote:

> The GNSO website has a huge amount of information on it, including  
> Agenda, Minutes and an MP3 of the proceedings (most often a  
> teleconference). Seems to be just what you are advocating.


i dearly love the GNSO and its council and relish in every bit of its  
process (and bet i could win a trivia contest on it).  I even think it  
is appropriate because of the GNSO's role in recommending policy that  
affects millions around the world.  For a group acting in the role  
recommending regulatory and contractual conditions, this level of  
process, and perhaps even more, is appropriate.

in the IGC, however, which i see as a group meant to build capacity  
and to advocate, it would be sad to see that much process.  i advocate  
a fairly minimal set of guidelines and the evolution of practice we  
are mostly comfortable with and just enough to keep the group sane -  
especially as long as we have an appeals mechanism.

tp put it another way: if the IGC starts to develop GNSO/ICANN level  
processes, i am sure i will find a cliff to drive myself off of.

a.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance