[governance] Results of charter amendment vote

[Roland Perry]

In message 
<30485564.1254161872255.JavaMail.root at mswamui-valley.atl.sa.earthlink.net
 >, at 13:17:52 on Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Jeffrey A. Williams 
<jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com> writes
>  I am a huge supporter of asynchronous work and utilize it
>frequently.  I rarely attend such meetings unless directed
>to do so and sponsered accordingly, but thanks for the
>personalize invite!  >:)
>
>  Properly managed and effected ICANN meetings should require
>few if any in person attendance.  My companies Board meetings
>are only one a year required for all Board members to attend
>physically/personally.  This is in part a security measure, and in
>part a economic one.  Works well once you get the hang of it, as
>it were.

People want things to progress faster than that. This is "Internet time" 
after all.

>  What's missing in such asynchronous work by the ICANN
>board members is that it is unseen and therefore questionalby
>known as to it actually occuring.  Given the history of ICANN
>Board decisions and GNSO council decisions terribly poor history,
>such questioning concerns appear significantly justified accordingly.

The GNSO website has a huge amount of information on it, including 
Agenda, Minutes and an MP3 of the proceedings (most often a 
teleconference). Seems to be just what you are advocating.
-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance