[Gov 738] Re: Competition ? Re: [governance] is icann ...

[Avri Doria]

On 21 Sep 2009, at 19:01, Dr. Francis MUGUET wrote:

> My point is reactivating this "forgotten parameter"  could be done,
> with little conceptual difficulties and a sofware programming effort
> that is very small in comparison to the  huge  benefits in all terms :
> economics, governance, scientific,


It is all well and good that you persist in your belief  of the ease  
with which you can do this.  You may have access to a genius solution  
i just do not see, for i do not see the easy path you see.  i see an  
interesting research problem with lots of open issues and gotchas  
ahead, but i could be wrong.

i look forward to seeing the Internet-drafts/proposals in which you  
produce well formed definitions of your classes and define the schema  
for your new URIs.  i expect they will be very thorough and will cover  
all of the possible case and issues so that they can be subject to  
serious technical review.

And after that I will look forward to the running code and network  
experiments that prove your point and enable your triumphant 'i told  
you so'.

Then it will make sense to work on the business case and governance  
models for the implementation.

a.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance