[governance] Letter to Rod Beckstrom
Jeanette Hofmann
jeanette at wzb.eu
Mon Sep 21 07:08:13 EDT 2009
Milton,
as you well know, re-inventing the wheel means to end up with the
institutions or processes that were discarded at some point.
I didn't claim that there are governmental achievements in the
transnational space. Rather, I meant to say that national democratic
institutions need to be transformed to make them effective outside of
the nation state.
I agree with you that it is problematic to associate governmental action
with pursuing the public interest. Yet, I find it even more problematic
to expect that the invisible hand of the market produces superior
outcomes from a public interest point of view. The remarkable thing of
the net neutrality debate was that, suddenly, the state as a regulator
and norm enforcement agency came back into Internet Governance.
Pragmatists are seeking to combine the best of both worlds. Isn't this
what the discussion on transnational governance is about? The term
de-nationalization suggests to me that we can do without governments.
In any case, national resources such as the rule of law and related
means of norm enforcement will remain necessary -and valuable -, no
matter how global the regulatory objects are.
jeanette
Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> In the long run, I think, a de-nationalized system of governance
>> would have to re-invent many of the governmental wheels that were
>> thrown overboard at the outset.
>
> Jeanette: Precisely. These rights and procedures have to be
> reinvented or translated into the transnational sphere. And what's
> wrong with that?
>
> Thrown overboard? In transnational communicative action there ARE no
> procedural achievements of nation-states - or at least I will hold to
> that thesis until you can provide me with an example of one.
>
> At any rate let's not forget that some of the most valuable
> procedural and legal checks we are talking about are checks on
> _states_ not just private actors. Political economists have long
> exploded the myth that political institutions are somehow purely
> devoted to public interest and magically transforms the mystical will
> of "the people" into action. States often actuate and reflect
> dominant private interests.
>
> --MM
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list