[governance] Dynamic Coallition on ICANN Accountability and International Conformity - IAIC
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Tue Sep 15 17:51:38 EDT 2009
hi,
i am planning to, ad it is a good idea.
but like many people, i rarely get comments in befoe the last day.
thanks for the reminder. when i saw your note i had moment's panic
thinking i had missed the deadline.
a.
On 15 Sep 2009, at 18:08, Danny Younger wrote:
> Interesting. ICANN puts up a public forum dealing with Proposed
> Bylaw Changes to Improve Accountability and not a single member of
> this community posts any comments whatsoever. Instead, community
> members tell us about plenary activities that are held that still
> don't result in any meaningful comments on accountability being put
> through directly to ICANN in a timely fashion.
>
> If you really cared about ICANN Accountability one would think that
> you would be conveying your concerns directly to ICANN when the
> opportunity presented itself. Comments may be sent to iic-proposed-bylaws at icann.org
> until 25 September.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 9/15/09, Fouad Bajwa <fouadbajwa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Fouad Bajwa <fouadbajwa at gmail.com>
>> Subject: [governance] Dynamic Coallition on ICANN Accountability
>> and International Conformity - IAIC
>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2009, 9:16 AM
>> Dear Members,
>>
>> As per the proceedings of the EuroDIG.org plenary no 3 on
>> The Post-JPA
>> Phase: towards a future Internet Governance Model, there
>> has been
>> discussion amongst the European Governments and
>> participants about the
>> role of ICANN and more accountability of it in terms of
>> Internet
>> Governance Forum. There has a need been identified for
>> creation of a
>> "Dynamic Coallition on ICANN Accountability and
>> International
>> Conformity - IAIC" (though proposed in its structure here
>> more
>> sensibly) at the IGF in order to deal with the ICANN
>> related issues
>> more strategically, tactically with a multistakeholder
>> participation
>> within the light of the Tunis Agenda or if not within this
>> context but
>> then realizing that although ICANNs constitutional
>> documents and
>> by-laws require it to co-operate with relevant
>> international
>> organisations and to carry out its activities in conformity
>> with
>> relevant principles of international law and applicable
>> international
>> conventions and local law, there are no related formal
>> accountability
>> arrangements and this can be the first step to create this
>> process.
>>
>> IGF process needs to be kept separate but interconnected
>> with ICANN
>> (though this comment is still very vague).
>>
>> Your suggestions on this proposal would be really useful
>> and I am
>> circulating this to other IG related lists for input and
>> participation.
>>
>> --
>> Regards.
>> --------------------------
>> Fouad Bajwa
>> @skBajwa
>> Answering all your technology questions
>> http://www.askbajwa.com
>> http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATVDW1tDZzA
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list