RES: [governance] Review Panels
Vanda UOL
vanda at uol.com.br
Fri Oct 16 11:19:42 EDT 2009
Estimado Jose
Yo soy miembro del Comité de usuarios de internet que tienen asiento en ALAC
(vea en el site www.icann.org/alac) asta este meeting en Seoul soy Vice
Chair de ALC como persona de Latino América y Caribe y donde todos los
interesados poden participar. Nos gustaría muchísimo que como ISOC Peru
usted aplicase para ser una ALS de LACRALO, la organización regional de
Latino América y Caribe ( visite
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists
.icann.org ) y se quieres mi dirección en SKYPE es vanda(punto) scartezini,
y podemos hablar o pro chat, como quieras.
Abrazos y por favor cualquiera duda que tengas , email: vanda at uol.com.br
Perdóname el "portuñol"
Abrazos
Vanda Scartezini
NEXTI
Alameda Santos 1470 cjs 1407/8
Tel: + 55 11 3266.6253
Mob: + 55 11 8181 1464
-----Mensagem original-----
De: jfcallo at isocperu.org [mailto:jfcallo at isocperu.org]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 15 de outubro de 2009 21:40
Para: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Danny Younger
Cc: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Bertrand de La Chapelle; Anriette Esterhuysen
Assunto: Re: [governance] Review Panels
Distinguished members of this list:
I write from Lima, Peru, we are interested in participating in ICANN,
contribute from our experience, how do to connect with ICANN?, Send an
e-mail for 10 days and no one responds.
Thanks
Jose F. Callo Romero
Secretario
ISOC Peru
Quoting Danny Younger <dannyyounger at yahoo.com>:
> Bertrand,
>
> There is more to this equation than diversity, balance, and
> representativeness; these review panels will require individuals
> with extensive knowledge regarding the particulars of the areas
> under review (which is why independent experts are cited as part of
> the necessary review team mix).
>
> The teams will include:
>
> the Chair of the GAC
> the CEO of ICANN
> representatives of the Root Server System Advisory Committee
> representatives of the Security and Stability Advisory Committee
> representatives of the At-Large Advisory Committee
> representatives of the Generic Names Supporting Organization
> representatives of the Address Supporting Organization
> representatives of the Country Code Names Supporting Organization
> independent experts (likely drawn from either the Technical Liason
> Group, the IETF, the IAB, or from the pool of volunteer community
> members)
>
> and in the accountability/transparency review team, these members
> will be joined by the Assistant Secretary for Communications and
> Information of the DOC,
>
> The current arrangement calls for the composition of the review
> team to be agreed jointly by the Chair of the GAC (in consultation
> with GAC members) and the CEO of ICANN.
>
> Like all comparable ICANN processes, there will likely be a call for
> volunteers (similar to the recent call for NSCG placeholder
> councilors). The ICANN Board will then privately settle upon
> whomever best promotes the ICANN interest (likely those that have
> never been critics) and will then advance those names to the Chair
> of the GAC.
>
> I fully expect these reviews to be as much of a whitewash as all
> earlier ICANN self-review efforts. Perhaps you will recall the
> earlier commissioned review of transparency and accountability
> provided in the One World Trust report -- we were told that ICANN is
> a model of transparency with robust accountability mechanisms... and
> yet we all know the reality.
>
> Don't waste your energy on this project. The deck will be stacked
> from day one.
>
> best regards,
> Danny Younger
>
>
> --- On Thu, 10/15/09, Bertrand de La Chapelle
> <bdelachapelle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle at gmail.com>
> Subject: [governance] Review Panels
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org, "Anriette Esterhuysen" <anriette at apc.org>
> Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009, 4:33 AM
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Could this list also address Anriette's concrete second question ?
> What do you think the review process should be ? Fundamentally, the
> community is facing a now recurring problem (cf. WGIG, MAG,...) :
> how to compose a multi-stakeholder group for a given task, so that
> it is sufficiently diverse, balanced and representative of the
> variety of viewpoints ?
>
> In addition, what do you tink the timing is ?
>
> Best
>
> Bertrand
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Anriette Esterhuysen
> <anriette at apc.org> wrote:
>
> snip
>
> Second question is about the submissions on the review panels. What is
> the process likely to be?
>
> Anriette
>
>
>
>
> --
> ____________________
> Bertrand de La Chapelle
> Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for
> the Information Society
> Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of
> Foreign and European Affairs
> Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32
>
> "Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de
> Saint Exupéry
> ("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list