[governance] FW: Internet Users Globally
Jaco Aizenman
skorpio at gmail.com
Sat Nov 21 13:56:30 EST 2009
For a person in extreme poverty is more important to have a bank account
where he can receive funds from pulic and not public entities, than to have
access to email or the Web.
So access should be understood not just access to email or web ( you must
know to read and write before..., not just having infrastructure...), but
being present on the internet.
And being present is having a bank account first!, and later other forms o
presence.... (email, web access, etc).
That´s why the Costa Rican COngress is processing a bill (No. 15890) to add
an additional fundamental right: "Having or not, virtual personality".
A bank account is a component of the virtual personality (also email acount,
voicemail, etc, etc).
PD Eric: Like Michael G., I also have sometimes problems trying to
understand your writings..., so I apreciate if you can "write for dumbs" in
the future...., so I can understand more... ;-)
2009/11/20 Eric Dierker <cogitoergosum at sbcglobal.net>
> Perhaps then in a non boolean way you could answer the simple question;
>
> What concerns of your 5.5 were not addressed?
>
> Seems like your looking for a hypothetical problem. Tell us what was not
> addressed.
>
> (please, as you pointed out this was not about medicine or public safety or
> plumbing -- so give us an example that is germaine to Internet Governance
> not tennis in the Hamptons)
>
> --- On *Fri, 11/20/09, Michael Gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Michael Gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com>
> Subject: RE: [governance] FW: Internet Users Globally
> To: "'Eric Dierker'" <cogitoergosum at sbcglobal.net>,
> governance at lists.cpsr.org, "'linda misek-falkoff'" <
> ldmisekfalkoff at gmail.com>
> Cc: "'l.d. misek-falkoff'" <ldmisekfalkoff at gmail.com>,
> respectful.interfaces at gmail.com
> Date: Friday, November 20, 2009, 10:09 AM
>
>
> Eric and all,
>
> So far as I know, I/we are not dealing here with matters of formal Boolean
> logic but rather concerns with the significance and impact of Internet
> Governance in the real world.
>
> My question was (and remains) whether the matters under discussion were of
> significance to the roughly 5.5 billion without current Internet access in
> the real world and not whether the issues themselves were impacted or not by
> the numbers of those having Internet access, a subject which I personally
> consider to be of no interest whatsoever.
>
> Your arguments and the analysis of your (and my) arguments are to my mind
> complete red herrings.
>
> MBG
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Eric Dierker [mailto:cogitoergosum at sbcglobal.net]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:06 PM
> *To:* governance at lists.cpsr.org; linda misek-falkoff; Michael Gurstein
> *Cc:* l.d. misek-falkoff; respectful.interfaces at gmail.com
> *Subject:* Re: [governance] FW: Internet Users Globally
>
> I believe and always have that saying things in a couple of different
> ways or languages or within differing social or cultural logics is most
> helpful. Your questions asks for a fair diagram of my antithesis in a
> straightforward manner. Fair enough.
>
> 1. Does the percentage of actual users in a given set have a significant
> impact on the issues presented? Mr. Gurstein makes that connection.
> 2. My antithesis to the positive belief of Mr. Gurstein is that it does not
> matter how many users there are with regard to issues presented.
> 3. My conclusion is that the percentage of users within any jurisdiction
> did not in any way influence the issues addressed most recently.
>
> It is my observation that although not representative either by vote or
> election or life position, the members here and in general engaged in
> Internet Governance in fact do address the issues of the users and those
> effected and affected by the Internet. This suitable cadre of individuals in
> fact can see the large picture of protecting rights of non users as well as
> users and does in fact address those concerns.
>
> On a more appropriate observation -- I try very hard to remain as ignorant
> and ill informed as I can so that I can adequately represent others like me.
>
> --- On *Thu, 11/19/09, linda misek-falkoff <ldmisekfalkoff at gmail.com>*wrote:
>
>
> From: linda misek-falkoff <ldmisekfalkoff at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [governance] FW: Internet Users Globally
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org, "Michael Gurstein" <gurstein at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Eric Dierker" <cogitoergosum at sbcglobal.net>, "l.d. misek-falkoff" <
> ldmisekfalkoff at gmail.com>, respectful.interfaces at gmail.com
> Date: Thursday, November 19, 2009, 7:55 PM
>
> Hi Michael, I was in my post, above, also delving for a minimalist
> description of the different approaches to topic here; so if you can
> clarify or wish to, in response to my post (by choice of course, and no need
> to explicitly use *thesis, antithesis, synthesis* if not seeming apt) -
> thanks.
>
> (I wouldn't ask Eric's artistic and exciting style and content to change a
> whit, or his wit to subside. But all of you here can probably parse out the
> points of view for initiates upon this request; would be quite welcome).
>
> Best wishes, Linda.
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Michael Gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gurstein@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
>> Eric,
>>
>> I have no idea what this sentence could possibly mean from any
>> perspective--development, social science, marketing, management--"Direct
>> use
>> and consumption of a good or service is not any kind of test as to it's
>> viability or value to a society."
>>
>> Anyway, since we aren't talking about syringes or police academies (???)
>> but
>> rather about access to the major and fundamental infrastructure of modern
>> society --
>>
>> The unavailability of access is a major impediment to participation and
>> development... In my country, Canada, the fact that roughly 25% of the
>> population is not accessing the Internet means that the range of public
>> and
>> private services that have and are migrating to the Net are inaccessible
>> for
>> use by those individuals leading either to the requirement for duplication
>> of services (both manual and electronic) or to the denial of service
>> (where
>> the service is available only in electronic form...
>>
>> In the Cameroun (with which I'm not familiar) or in South Africa (with
>> which
>> I am familiar) lack of access to the Net means that the 97.1% (the
>> Cameroun)
>> or the 91.4% (South Africa) of the population not currently accessing/able
>> to access the Net prevents them from having access to the knowledge,
>> training, and support resources that are available to those with such
>> access. Perhaps most important this means that the huge bulk of the
>> population is not sufficiently informatized as to make a direct
>> contribution
>> to those activities which will spur local and national economic and social
>> development. South Africa for example, has a significant net shortage of
>> those with sufficient skills to occupy available technical positions
>> necessary to maintain and extend the Information Society/Information
>> Economy. That individuals, communities, local institutions are unable to
>> access the Net makes it all that much more difficult to bridge these gaps,
>> fill these slots and so on and so on.
>>
>> All of which is to give me an opportunity to say once again BTW, how
>> disappointed I am that there seems to have been little or no discussion at
>> the IGF (although simply observing from afar I may have missed it) about
>> issues of concern to the other 5.5 billion or so not currently accessing
>> the
>> Net.
>>
>> MBG
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Eric Dierker
>> <cogitoergosum at sbcglobal.net<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cogitoergosum@sbcglobal.net>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> This argument line is specious. Direct use and consumption of a good or
>> service is not any kind of test as to it's viability or value to a
>> society.
>>
>> Do we say that since only 2% of the population uses syringe(s) to
>> inoculate
>> thousands that the regulation and governance of medical appliances is not
>> relevant? Do we say that because only the supplier uses a
>> telecommunication
>> device to supply food more efficiently and less expensive that the
>> telecommunication device is not relevant to the eater?
>> Are police academies not relevant to the safety of a small child?
>>
>> In fact the complete opposite is true. The need for intermediaries and
>> those
>> skilled is the only reason to allow all of us pontithicators to have any
>> say
>> in governance. The fact that the hunter and gatherer brings home the food
>> from the forest does not obsolve or relinquish the right and duty of the
>> homemaker to manage his forest and fields. And since facts and opinions
>> without study and understanding are more dangerous than helpful, I
>> tolerate
>> all of you speaking for the consumer ;-) You all be careful that I do not
>> come up with an instant vaccine against ignorance, lest and whilst you be
>> out of a job.
>>
>>
>> --- On Thu, 11/19/09, Nyangkwe Agien Aaron <nyangkweagien at gmail.com<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nyangkweagien@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Nyangkwe Agien Aaron <nyangkweagien at gmail.com<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nyangkweagien@gmail.com>
>> >
>> Subject: Re: [governance] FW: Internet Users Globally
>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org>,
>> "Michael Gurstein" <gurstein at gmail.com<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gurstein@gmail.com>
>> >
>> Date: Thursday, November 19, 2009, 10:42 AM
>>
>>
>>
>> Many thanks Michael for the revelation.
>> I can now understand that despite the availability of an optical fibre
>> along the cost of my country Cameroun about 97.1% of my fellow country
>> men and women do not use internet. Astonishing is the finding that
>> only 86.56 Senegalese do not have access to Internet.
>> And when you look at the per capita income of both countries!!!
>>
>> Internet bandwith capacity in my office is here in Douala is 256/64
>>
>> Aaon
>>
>> On 11/18/09, Michael Gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gurstein@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> For a very revealing application concerning Internet users by country
>> go
>> >> to the
>> >>
>> >> If you go to Google and put "Internet users in (your country of
>> choice)"
>> >> into the search bar you will get the information graphed by year!
>> >>
>> > I'm wondering how much of the discussion at this year's IGF was of
>> relevance
>> > to the 99.19% of Malians who are not currently Internet users (or
>> similalry
>> > for 99.16% of Chadians, 89.49% of Bolivians, 92.8% of Indians, 98.18% of
>> > Papua New Guineans etc.etc.
>> >
>> >> MBG
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Aaron Agien Nyangkwe
>> Journalist-OutCome Mapper
>> Special Assistant The President
>> ASAFE
>> P.O.Box 5213
>> Douala-Cameroon
>>
>> Tel. 237 3337 55 31, 3337 50 22
>> Fax. 237 3342 29 70
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org>
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org>
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org>
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org>
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> LDMF.
>> > Dr. Linda D. Misek-Falkoff
>> > 914 769 3652
>> > law / computing / humanities:
>> > Founder/Director *Respectful Interfaces*;
>> > Member, Board, Officer - Communications Coordination Committee for the
>> > U.N.;
>> > World Education Fellowship;
>> > Member Committees on disability, aging, health, values, development;
>> > National Disability Party (NDP); International Disability Caucus;
>> > Persons with Pain Intl.;
>> > ICT multiple decades;
>> > Other affiliations on Request.
>> >
>> > n.b.:
>>
>> > - You are welcome to join *Respectful Interfaces.* The *Respectful
>> > Interfaces* Coda is: "Achieving Dialogue While Cherishing Diversity"
>> (ask
>> > about leadership interning).
>>
>> > - Communication, Cooperation and Collaboration are core values of the
>> CCC/UN.
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>>
>>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org>
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org>
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org>
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org>
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
--
Jaco Aizenman L.
Presidente
Registro de Activos Financieros - RAF
------------------------
My iname is =jaco (http://xri.net/=jaco)
XDI Board member - www.xdi.org
Tel/Voicemail: 506-83461570
Costa Rica
What is an i-name?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-name
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20091121/76c7fa3e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list