[governance] Request for extending comments on IGF review

[Ian Peter]

I think IGC should endorse this request. What do others think? As discussed
at our meeting, this review session appears as if it will not hear all
viewpoints people want to express and the extra comment period would allow
this to be redressed in some way.


On 16/11/09 4:20 PM, "Willie Currie" <wcurrie at apc.org> wrote:

> Hi all
> 
> We learned during the IGC meeting on Saturday that the number of
> speakers at the Stocktaking session would be limited and that
> governments would have precedence. Other stakeholders were asked to
> cluster their inputs. At the MAG meeting on Saturday, it was made clear
> that the UN secretariat would be running the session and would not take
> comments after the session. Written comments can be made up to the session.
> 
> Because of these limitations I propose that we should make a request for
> an additional three week comment period in the IGC statement to the
> Stocktaking session. It's unclear if APC will be able to speak, but if
> we can, we will make a similar request. We should also encourage other
> academic and CS speakers to do the same. I understand ICC Basis will
> also include a similar request.
> 
> Willie
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance