[governance] FYI: Letter from Bulgarian Internet community
Parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Sun May 31 12:20:47 EDT 2009
George Sadowsky wrote:
> All,
>
> I believe that what Jefsey writes about platinum members of ISOC being
> able to designate areas for standardization (presumably in the IETF,
> since that's where that happens) is and incorrect. The quote below
> does not come from the page he references.
George,
What Jefsey wrote does come directly from the document he links, if you
keep reading it after the quote you refer to. The full quote in the
document is:
"The Platinum Sponsorship Program allows your company to specifically
designate areas or projects to be supported in the fields of a)
Standards, b) Public Policy or c) Education and Training. Your
organization will have enhanced, direct consultation with ISOC regarding
its activities in your funded area. Additional benefits also apply."
> The actual quote on that page is:
>
> "Supporting our Platinum Program gives your company the ability to
> focus your contributions specifically on the essential work of the
> IETF and our Standards activities.."
>
> Supporting the standards activities in general is not the same as, as
> he suggests, specifically designating areas or projects to be
> supported in the fields of standards.
>
> George
Now that you know what he quoted is correct, what are your comments on
it, as someone who I understand is closely associated with ISOC. BTW
the term 'enhanced .... consultations' reminds me of something :) but
that is another matter .
I have a huge problem with anyone being allowed to buy a position on the
governance system of a body which is either closely involved in policy
making, or claims to be a civil society body (and ISOCs seems to do
both). I also have problem with providing any kind of preferred access
to policy spaces for private interests that are impacted by the
concerned policies, which is expressly mentioned in the above quote. My
concerns follow from what are hallowed canons of democratic societies,
and the fact that we are increasingly compromising them is indeed alarming.
I find these practices fundamentally antithetical to building of
legitimate and democratic governance and civil society structures and
basically against public interest. However, regrettably, the ideology
behind these kinds of practices is catching on which I think is one of
the biggest dangers our society faces today. (Remember, it was tried at
the IGF as well, with a threat to pull out funding if certain issues
were raised at the IGF.)
I brought up exactly the same point at the recent workshop on APC-CoE's
proposed code of good practices on participation, transparency etc. The
list of the IG organizations reviewed in the study done by David Souter
for the above proposed code included ISOC. I inter alia raised the issue
that we also need to review practices related to the relationship of
funding with seats in governance structures and preferred access to
policy spaces. This is an important aspect of participation and
transparency, which just cannot be left out.
I earnestly hope that ISOC as a body involved in policy making, or as a
civil society entity, or both, will respond to these key issues that are
being raised about its practices.
Parminder
PS: At another place the ISOC doc says: "...you can direct your support
dollars towards the Internet Society's public policy activities and
ensure that your voice will be heard on these critical issues". Does
ISOC act as a lobbying organization on behalf of any big corporate that
can afford to pay it? Are the public policy positions of ISOC then not
obviously disproportionately influenced by these big corporate funders?
These are important questions ISOC must answer as a key player in the
public arena vis a vis IG issues.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> At 10:56 AM +0200 5/31/09, jefsey wrote:
>> Je présente mes excuses au lecteurs francophones à qui ce mail est
>> copié. Il m'est apparu que l'importance des documents présentés et le
>> sujet considéré le méritaient.
>> jfc
>> --------
>> Nikola, Milton,
>> The letter of Nikola and the answer of Milton are serious points
>> worth to careful consideration. Thank you, in particular at a time
>> the French Government wants to introduce a similar legislation to the
>> Bulgarian one (they all more or less copy and adapt Patriot Act).
>> I do not think ISOC makes any mystery about this. ISOC consider they
>> are the owner of the IETF which has "strong participation from the
>> computing, networking, and telecommunications industries, from
>> companies large and small"
>> http://www.isoc.org/isoc/membership/orgwhyjoin/membership2.pdf, where
>> ISOC "Platinum Sponsorship Program allows companies to specifically
>> designate areas or projects to be supported in the fields of Standards".
>>
>> I currently oppose at key IETF/WG-IDNABIS that reading of the IETF by
>> some IETF/ISOC preeminent persons. However, I think the best way to
>> oppose is to build aside and make the two resulting stakeholders to
>> cooperate. This is why I first introduced the Internet Users
>> Contributing Group (http://iucg.org and its main iucg at ietf.org
>> mailing list) to permit users to contribute to the technology they
>> use. I also have introduced the http://isoc-ipv6.org open proposition
>> of a "usage oriented IPv6" ISOC Chapter : at this stage ISOC
>> Secretariat said they did not wish to support it because there
>> already is an effort by them to support the "technical IPv6" (IMHO
>> the lack of IPv6 development comes from this misunderstanding between
>> a technical need and a user lack of information and documented need).
>>
>> My idea is that the more the users (the Chapter should represent) can
>> be active or even leading at ISOC the best it is and the more ISOC
>> can really represent everyone.
>> jfc
>>
>>
>> At 19:41 30/05/2009, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>> Content-Language: en-US
>>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>>
>>> boundary="_000_75822E125BCB994F8446858C4B19F0D77B2209E2SUEX07MBX04adsy_"
>>>
>>> Nikola:
>>> It is good to know that there is an independent group of Bulgarian
>>> Internet users.
>>>
>>> ISOC has a rather checkered history when it comes to defending
>>> rights of individuals on the Internet. While there are many strong
>>> supporters of Internet freedom in its ranks, as well as dedicated
>>> technical veterans of the highest caliber, its international
>>> organizational staff and business connections often lead it in
>>> strange directions. And as they become more interconnected with
>>> authoritative Internet governance institutions, ISOC often pursues
>>> agendas that are....puzzling, to put it mildly. It is useful to
>>> recall in this context ISOC's role in promoting the discredited
>>> gTLD-MoU, which would have put WIPO and the ITU in a key governance
>>> role, and would have allowed WIPO and INTA to have almost
>>> untrammeled authority over resolving domain name trademark disputes.
>>> ICANN's UDRP, with all its flaws, was quite liberal compared to what
>>> ISOC, WIPO, INTA and ITU cooked up for us a dozen years ago.
>>>
>>> Milton Mueller
>>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
>>> XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Internet Governance Project:
>>> http://internetgovernance.org <http://internetgovernance.org/>
>>>
>>
>> At 18:41 30/05/2009, Nikola Geshev wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> Yesterday a letter from people of the Bulgarian Internet community
>>> was sent to ISOC.
>>> You may be intereted to read it.
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Nikola Geshev
>>> Bulgarian Internet Users Group
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Ms. Lynn St Amour
>>> President/CEO of ISOC
>>> Dear Ms. Amour,
>>> We would like to bring to your attention the issue that in a public
>>> press-conference on May, 24th, Mr. Veni Markovski, head of the
>>> Bulgarian chapter of Internet Society (ISOC) for more than 12 years
>>> and also an ICANN employee, announced that ISOC Bulgaria supports
>>> the candidates of "Coalition for Bulgaria" (leading party is
>>> Bulgarian Socialist Party) for the upcoming elections for European
>>> parliament in Bulgaria. (We attach many newspaper reports and web
>>> links in section III of the appendix. In Section V of the appendix
>>> you may find some reactions of the members of ISOC Bulgaria.)
>>>
>>> We are taken aback by the support of ISOC Bulgaria for a political
>>> party. Shouldn't all ISOC chapters be politically neutral? We do not
>>> deny the right of Mr. Veni Markovski to support personally any
>>> candidate for the upcoming elections, only his right to cast an ISOC
>>> branch as a supporter for one.
>>>
>>> In addition, the current ruling coalition in Bulgaria, lead by the
>>> Bulgarian Socialist Party, took some actions that were highly
>>> unpopular among the Bulgarian Internet users:
>>>
>>> * In 2008, The State Agency for Information technologies (whose
>>> advisor is Mr. Markovski) and the Ministry of Interior affairs
>>> tried to introduce a Decree that would enforce all Internet
>>> providers in Bulgaria to collect and store for a long period
>>> practically complete, and personally identifiable information
>>> about anything done by all Internet users (eg. the sites they
>>> visited, the e-mails they wrote etc.) According to the Decree,
>>> the police would be able to access all of this information at
>>> any time, without the need for a court order or an explanation
>>> why they might need it, without leaving any trace that it was
>>> accessed, and without informing the Internet users that they
>>> are, or have been tracked.
>>> * The proposed decree met the strong opposition of the Bulgarian
>>> Internet community. The minister of Interior affairs, Mr.
>>> Mihail Mikov wanted to make this a reality and added the texts
>>> in a law for the amendment of "Law for electronic messages".
>>> When the Bulgarian parliament overthrew the proposed law, Mr.
>>> Mikov insisted for an re-vote. The law was put by the ruling
>>> coalition, headed by BSP, for re-vote four times (which is
>>> also against the Bulgarian constitution). See part IV. of the
>>> attached appendix for more information.
>>> * Strangely enough, Mr. Mikov is a member of the Internet
>>> Society in Bulgaria, as well as other government oficials who
>>> are members of BSP.
>>> * More information about the mentioned cases is available from
>>> the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee: _
>>> http://www.bghelsinki.org/index.php?module=news&lg=en&id=1099_
>>> <http://www.bghelsinki.org/index.php?module=news&lg=en&id=1099>
>>> or from an online newspaper here: _ http://tinyurl.com/qrjpq9_
>>> , _ http://tinyurl.com/ot5duv_ , _ http://tinyurl.com/oqo6xk_
>>> , _ http://tinyurl.com/qdjv74_ and _ http://tinyurl.com/p88ba6_
>>> * Several pan-European watchdogs have reported in recent years
>>> that the current Bulgarian Government is the most corrupt in
>>> the European Union (See Section II from the attached
>>> Appendix). The National Security agency, which is subservient
>>> to the Bulgarian prime minister closed an Internet website
>>> that was spreading information about corruption. You can find
>>> more information from "Reporters without Borders" here: _
>>> http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=28543_
>>>
>>> We would like to know whether ISOC supports the position of Mr.
>>> Markovski, and seconds his support for parties that strive to
>>> implement this type of legislation.
>>> In case that ISOC doesn't support such positions, we would also like
>>> to know whether their dissent will be only verbal, or will be backed
>>> by actions.
>>>
>>> *Bulgarian Internet Users Group
>>> *Attachments:
>>>
>>> *I. Articles from "Reporters Without Borders"
>>> *
>>> 1. Bulgaria - World Report 2009
>>>
>>> _ http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=31015__
>>> _
>>>
>>> 2. Bulgaria - Annual Report 2008
>>>
>>> _ http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=25469__
>>> _
>>>
>>> 3. Former interior minister says "spineless" journalist should be "hit"
>>>
>>> _ http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=29263__
>>> _
>>>
>>> 4. Threats against Frognews stepped up. Censored website
>>> Opasnite.net reappears on Opasnite.eu
>>>
>>> _ http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=28755__
>>> _
>>>
>>> 5. Vicious assault on editor of Frog News
>>>
>>> _ http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=28692__
>>> _
>>>
>>> 6. Security agency closes corruption whistle-blower website
>>>
>>> _ http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=28543__
>>> _
>>>
>>> *II. Bulgaria is the most corrupt country in the European Union,
>>> according to the Transparency International
>>> *
>>> _http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlargement/report-unveils-eu-corrupt-countries/article-175668
>>> _
>>> <http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlargement/report-unveils-eu-corrupt-countries/article-175668>
>>>
>>> *III. Newspaper articles that mention the ISOC Bulgaria support for
>>> "Coalition for Bulgaria"*
>>>
>>> 1. "*Duma" newspaper*
>>>
>>> 1. Original: _
>>> http://www.duma.bg/2009/0509/250509/bulgaria/bul-5.html_
>>>
>>> 2. Archive: _
>>> http://www.pressboard.info/Preview.aspx?articleid=112957_
>>>
>>> 3. Partial translation:
>>>
>>> 1. Internet Society supports "Coalition for
>>> Bulgaria"
>>>
>>> 2. "We support the list of Coalition for
>>> Bulgaria for the European elections, because
>>> they are the politicians who work to protect the
>>> interests of Internet users." It was said by the
>>> chairman of the organization "Internet Society
>>> in Bulgaria - Veni Markovski. ... "It is
>>> important to support politicians who share our
>>> values and defend the idea of using the Cyrillic
>>> alphabet in the virtual space", also stressed
>>> Markovski and thanked the Prime Minister Sergey
>>> Stanishev, who is a member for years of the
>>> Internet Society.
>>>
>>> 2. "*Monitor" newspaper*
>>>
>>> 1. Archive: _
>>> http://www.pressboard.info/Preview.aspx?articleid=112935_
>>>
>>> 2. Partial translation:
>>>
>>> 1. The support of the Internet Society in
>>> Bulgaria for "Coalition for Bulgaria" for the
>>> European parliament elections was presented
>>> personally by the President of the Governing
>>> Board of the organization, Veni Markovski.
>>> According to him, it is important to support
>>> politicians who share the values of the
>>> organization to use the Internet without
>>> restrictions and to protect the rights of
>>> consumers. Markovski added that Prime Minister
>>> Sergey Stanishev and President of the State
>>> Agency for Information Technologies and
>>> Communications Plamen Vachkov also enjoy the
>>> support of the Internet Society in Bulgaria.
>>>
>>> 3. "*Novinar" newspaper*
>>>
>>> 1. Original:
>>> _http://www.novinar.net/?act=news&act1=det&stat=center&mater=Mjk1Mzs2MQ_
>>> ==
>>> <http://www.novinar.net/?act=news&act1=det&stat=center&mater=Mjk1Mzs2MQ>
>>>
>>> 2. Archive: _
>>> http://www.pressboard.info/Preview.aspx?articleid=112952_
>>>
>>> 3. Partial translation:
>>>
>>> 1. Yesterday, the Internet Society -
>>> Bulgaria issued a statement that supports the
>>> list of the Coalition for Bulgaria and its
>>> candidates in elections to the European Parliament.
>>>
>>> 2. Cause the organization to stand behind
>>> the red party was that Stanishev shared values
>>> of society and the internet worked on consumer
>>> protection in the virtual space. Close
>>> relationship between the organization and the
>>> prime minister date for quite some years. During
>>> the celebration of the 10th anniversary of the
>>> Internet Society - Bulgaria in 2006, Stanishev
>>> attended as special guest.
>>>
>>> 4. "*Vsekiden" online edition*
>>>
>>> 1. Original: _ http://www.vsekiden.com/?p=51400_
>>>
>>> 2. Partial translation:
>>>
>>> 1. Internet Society - Bulgaria supports the
>>> list of Coalition for Bulgaria for the elections
>>> to the European Parliament (EP). This was said
>>> at a press conference by Veni Markovski,
>>> Chairman of the Board of the organization. It is
>>> important to support politicians who share the
>>> values of the Internet Society - Bulgaria to use
>>> the Internet without restrictions and protection
>>> of consumer rights, explained Markovski. He
>>> added that the Prime Minister and President of
>>> BSP Sergey Stanishev and President of the State
>>> Agency for Information Technologies and
>>> Communications Plamen Vachkov also enjoy the
>>> support of the Internet Society in Bulgaria,
>>> which are members for years.
>>>
>>>
>>> *5. "24 Chasa" newspaper
>>> *
>>> 1. Original: _ http://www.24chasa.bg/Article.asp?ArticleId=140197__
>>> _
>>> 2. Partial translation:
>>>
>>> Internet Society - Bulgaria supports the list of Coalition for
>>> Bulgaria for the elections for the European Parliament (EP), in
>>> which Ivaylo Kalfin and Christian Vigenin are included, BTA reported.
>>>
>>> "It is important to support politicians who share the values of the
>>> Internet Society - Bulgaria to use the Internet without restrictions
>>> and protection of consumer rights, said President of the
>>> organization Veni Markovski.
>>>
>>> He added that Sergey Stanishev and the President of the State Agency
>>> for Information Technologies and Communications Plamen Vachkov also
>>> enjoy the support of the Internet Society in Bulgaria, which are
>>> members for years. According to Ivaylo Kalfin, Internet is free
>>> space, where one must respect the laws, but not to impose restrictions.
>>>
>>>
>>> *6. "Gradski" online newspaper
>>> *
>>> 1. Original: _ http://www.gradski.bg/show.php?storyid=724067__
>>> _
>>> 2. Partial translation:
>>>
>>> Internet Society - Bulgaria supports the list of Coalition for
>>> Bulgaria for the elections to the European Parliament (EP), in which
>>> Ivaylo Kalfin and Christian Vigenin participate. This was told by
>>> Veni Markovski, Chairman of the Management Board of the organization.
>>>
>>> It is important to support politicians who share the values of the
>>> Internet Society - Bulgaria to use the Internet without restrictions
>>> and protection of consumer rights. Prime Minister and President of
>>> BSP Sergey Stanishev and President of the State Agency for
>>> Information Technologies and Communications Plamen Vachkov also
>>> enjoy the support of the Internet Society in Bulgaria, which are
>>> members for years, explained Markovski.
>>>
>>>
>>> *7. "Trud" newspaper
>>> *
>>> 1. Original: _ http://www.trud.bg/Article.asp?ArticleId=140199__
>>> _
>>> 2. Partial translation:
>>>
>>> Internet Society - Bulgaria stood behind BSP
>>>
>>> Internet Society - Bulgaria supports the list of Coalition for
>>> Bulgaria for the elections to the European Parliament (EP), which
>>> Ivaylo Kalfin and Christian VIGENIN, BTA reported.
>>>
>>> "It is important to support politicians who share the values of the
>>> Internet Society - Bulgaria to use the Internet without restrictions
>>> and protection of consumer rights, said President of the
>>> organization veins Markovski.
>>>
>>> He added that Sergey Stanishev and President of the State Agency for
>>> Information Technologies and Communications Plamen Vachkov also
>>> enjoy the support of the Internet Society in Bulgaria, which are
>>> members for years. According to Ivaylo Kalfin Internet is free
>>> space, which must respect the laws, but not to impose restrictions.
>>>
>>>
>>> *IV. Articles about actions of the current ruling coalition in Bulgaria:
>>> *
>>>
>>> 1.
>>> _http://dnevnik.bg/bulgaria/2009/04/09/702570_parlamentut_othvurli_promenite_za_bezkontrolnoto/
>>> _
>>> 1. Translation:
>>>
>>> "By 74 votes in favor, 78 against and 3 abstentions, the parliament
>>> rejected amendments to the Law on electronic communications,
>>> providing the Ministry of Interior affairs an uncontrolled access to
>>> data from the Internet and telephone printouts. In the original vote
>>> on the amendment there were 89 MPs for, 74 against and six
>>> abstained, so the amendments would have passed on first reading. The
>>> president of the internal committee, Mincho Spasov (NMS), however
>>> called and asked for a re-vote to save "the visit of this law in the
>>> Constitutional Court." In the re-vote, after the cards of the absent
>>> MPs were gathered, the texts were rejected.
>>> <http://dnevnik.bg/bulgaria/2009/04/09/702570_parlamentut_othvurli_promenite_za_bezkontrolnoto/>
>>>
>>> This way the fourth consecutive attempt to provide special services
>>> to obtain traffic data without the permission of the judge failed.
>>> In November 2008, the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) repeal the
>>> ordinance 40 as unconstitutional, which under the very vast wording
>>> "for the operational-search activity" Interior Ministry could take
>>> the information and with so-called passive access to servers through
>>> a computer terminal, so as not to impose even send a request to the
>>> mobile and internet operators.
>>>
>>>
>>> In February the parliament even rejected a request of special
>>> services for a similar law that again would eliminate the
>>> requirement for the information to be obtained with the
>>> authorization of a judge and an indication of the grounds for the
>>> request. Then a check of "Dnevnik" newspaper showed that that the
>>> text that include the law of the Interior ministry is added in the
>>> proposal, but is unclear by whom, although the Parliamentary
>>> commission of Transport did not vote for it at all. After lengthy
>>> discussions MPs rejected this attempt to smoothly track the data and
>>> decided to receive only the detection of serious crimes and have a
>>> sanction of a judge.
>>>
>>>
>>> Already in the next few days interior ministry leadership reacted
>>> strongly to the changes and announced that it would be prevented
>>> from working on the hot track of crimes that do not keep serious as
>>> child pornography for example. They insisted that the work of the
>>> special services is seriously slowed by the need to obtain court
>>> authorization. Politicians replied that in emergency, data can be
>>> collected without the permission of a judge and then 24 hours later
>>> is necessary to obtain such a sanction.
>>>
>>>
>>> However, only twenty days after the decision of the parliament, the
>>> Interior Ministry has initiated changes in the law on electronic
>>> communications and by members of the BSP, MRF and independent submit
>>> them to parliament. They provide passive access to information
>>> through the interface and again to cast their need for
>>> operational-search activity. Changes caused serious disputes in
>>> parliament on the Committee on Transport include consideration of
>>> changes in its agenda an extraordinary and although its chairman
>>> Yordan Mirchev (NMS) and the opposition left, the BSP and the MRF
>>> supported the text. The Commission's decision was challenged, but
>>> the leadership allow him to parliament for consideration in plenary.
>>>
>>>
>>> Subsequently, the parliamentary committees of internal ordern and
>>> European integration rejected the amendments. As they have a
>>> negative opinion of the parliamentary department responsible for the
>>> coordination of legislation with the European Union. The Ombudsman
>>> also objected.
>>>
>>>
>>> National Assembly Chairman Georgi Pirinski (BSP) a few days ago also
>>> agreed that we must find a right balance between the rights of
>>> citizens and the need not to hamper the work of the Ministry. He
>>> told the opponents of the change that will help texts to be edited
>>> so that no one could track people without control. According to him,
>>> and according to the opposition and NMS, very suspect sought data
>>> records for telephone and Internet traffic prints - 330 000 records
>>> per year for 40 000 persons."
>>>
>>>
>>> *V. Articles about ISOC Bulgaria members disagreement with the
>>> statement by Mr. Markovski
>>> *
>>> *1. "Trud" newspaper
>>> *
>>> 1. Original: _ http://www.trud.bg/Article.asp?ArticleId=142971__
>>> _
>>> 2. Partial translation:
>>>
>>> Members of the Internet Society - Bulgaria expressed outrage and
>>> perplexity, because of the support for the list of the BSP for the
>>> European elections, claimed by Veni Markovski - Member of the
>>> Management Board of the organization. This was published in a press
>>> report from the Blue coalition.
>>>
>>> This position is expressed in an open letter to the Board of
>>> Internet Society - Bulgaria, signed by Ivan Kostov, Ekaterina
>>> Mihailova, Dimo Gyaurov and Ivo Tsanev.
>>>
>>> The letter states that in the formulation of political support for
>>> the BSP, ISOC Bulgaria and Veni Markovski did not sought the views
>>> of members of the organization.
>>>
>>> "We consider inadmissible association called upon to protect the
>>> interests of Internet users to associate itself with the party,
>>> known for trying to restrict information rights and freedoms in
>>> Bulgaria," says the letter.
>>>
>>>
>>> *2. "Dnevnik" newspaper
>>> *
>>> 1. Original:
>>> _http://www.dnevnik.bg/izbori2009/2009/05/28/726610_predstaviteli_na_siniata_koaliciia_protestirat_sreshtu/
>>> _
>>> 2. Partial translation:
>>>
>>> Representatives of the "Blue coalition" protest against the support
>>> of the Internet Society Bulgaria to the list of BSP
>>>
>>> Representatives of the Blue coalition protest against support for
>>> the BSP list for European elections, claimed by the member of the
>>> Governing Board of the Internet Society Veni Markovski.
>>>
>>> In an open letter to the Board of Internet Society -- Bulgaria, Ivan
>>> Kostov, Ekaterina Mihaylova (DSB), and Ivo Dimo Gyaurov Tsanev (UDF)
>>> expressed "indignation and perplexity" of the actions of Markovski.
>>> Categorically say that in the formulation of political support for
>>> the BSP by Mr. Markovski has not sought the views of members of the
>>> organization. It is inadmissible for an association called upon to
>>> protect the interests of Internet users to associate itself with the
>>> party, known for trying to limited information rights and freedoms
>>> in Bulgaria.
>>> <http://www.dnevnik.bg/izbori2009/2009/05/28/726610_predstaviteli_na_siniata_koaliciia_protestirat_sreshtu/>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20090531/03df0e95/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list