[governance] Upcoming OC meeting in Geneva May 13: IGC agenda?

[McTim]

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette at wzb.eu> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it seems obvious that from a civil society point of view, we would not be
> happy about replacing a unilateral oversight model by a multilateral
> equivalent.

Agreed.

The questions that bothers me is
> 1. how a multi-stakeholder model could still have some teeth (non-state
> actors usually lack the authority for binding decisions)
> 2. how a multi-stakeholder model could still be independent of ICANN. I am
> sure ICANN would try to be part of the body supposed to oversee ICANN.
> Within a multi-stakeholder framework, I don't see on what grounds this could
> be prevented.

Won't CS have the most oversight over ICANN by electing as many CS
reps on the ICANN BoD as is possible?  That's the model I prefer!

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance