[governance] Proposed text for a sign-on or IGC statement re:

[Jeanette Hofmann]

Do we really need to handle this via the mailing list? It creates a lot 
of traffic...
jeanette

Ian Peter wrote:
> That seems to be the best way forward.
> 
> So if you want to be individually listed, just sign up here (many others
> have) Include your country and organizational affiliation.
> 
> And if you have strong concerns list them here as well, that would determine
> whether IGC as such is a signatory or not
> 
> Ian Peter
> PO Box 429
> Bangalow NSW 2479
> Australia
> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
> www.ianpeter.com
>  
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lee W McKnight [mailto:lmcknigh at syr.edu]
>> Sent: 27 March 2009 03:53
>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Meryem Marzouki
>> Subject: RE: [governance] Proposed text for a sign-on or IGC statement re:
>>
>> I agree with Meryem's suggested approach, for maximum impact on ICANN's
>> conisderation of this, both the collective of IGC member and folks in
>> their individual capacities and affiliations should be listed - with their
>> consent of course.
>>
>> (sign me up too)
>>
>> Lee
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Meryem Marzouki [marzouki at ras.eu.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:45 AM
>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> Subject: Re: [governance] Proposed text for a sign-on or IGC statement re:
>>
>> Both approaches are not mutually exclusive. The text may list
>> signatures (distinguishing organizational/entities and individual
>> signatures) and, among the entities signatures, have the IGC as a
>> whole if there is consensus on this.
>> Obviously, IGC members cannot be individually listed unless they
>> explicitely sign up.
>> Meryem
>>
>> Le 25 mars 09 à 22:48, Milton L Mueller a écrit :
>>
>>> That is great, Ian, but in some ways it's better to have a lot of
>>> names on a list, especially if countries of residence and
>>> organizational affiliation are shown.
>>> Perhaps it can be a caucus statement and we could just list the
>>> caucus members?
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Ian Peter [ian.peter at ianpeter.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 3:39 PM
>>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Milton L Mueller
>>> Subject: RE: [governance] Proposed text for a sign-on or IGC
>>> statement re: ICANN NCSG
>>>
>>> Hi Milton, thanks for getting this underway.
>>>
>>> I’ll leave detailed comment to others, but unless there is strong
>>> disagreement I can’t see why this can’t be a statement from the
>>> Caucus as a whole, rather than just members who sign on. That would
>>> change some of the wording at the top to simply “The Internet
>>> Governance Caucus wishes to express our support” (with perhaps a
>>> phrase on who the Caucus is)
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyway sign me up!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ian Peter
>>>
>>> PO Box 429
>>>
>>> Bangalow NSW 2479
>>>
>>> Australia
>>>
>>> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
>>>
>>> www.ianpeter.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu]
>>> Sent: 26 March 2009 03:14
>>> To: 'governance at lists.cpsr.org'
>>> Subject: [governance] Proposed text for a sign-on or IGC statement
>>> re: ICANN NCSG
>>>
>>>
>>> The organizations and individuals listed below are members of and
>>> participants in the civil society Internet Governance Caucus. We
>>> wish to express our support for version 6.0 of the Noncommercial
>>> Stakeholders Group (NCSG) charter developed by the Noncommercial
>>> Users Constituency. While there may still be room for minor
>>> improvements, we believe that the basic principles on which the
>>> charter is founded provide the fairest and most effective basis for
>>> civil society representation in ICANN’s Generic Names Supporting
>>> Organization.
>>>
>>> We specifically support the proposal because:
>>>  * It was developed transparently and with many opportunities for
>>> input by relevant ICANN participants;
>>>  * It makes it easy to form constituencies or affinity groups, but
>>> avoids fragmentation of noncommercial stakeholders into independent
>>> constituencies with separate mailing lists, administrative
>>> structures and representatives;
>>>  * It permits individual membership in the NCSG and does not
>>> require individuals to fit themselves into arbitrarily-defined
>>> categories that may not correspond to their interests and needs;
>>>  * It fosters representation of minority viewpoints in consensus-
>>> based Working Groups, but does not rigidly assign votes to small
>>> factions, instead offering them a chance to build consensus
>>>
>>> We also note that the alternative charter proposal seems designed
>>> to give a specific faction guaranteed Council seats and does not
>>> foster global, geographically diverse representation.
>>>
>>> We appreciate ICANN’s effort to make its GNSO more representative
>>> and urge you to ratify and accept the NCSG charter.
>>>
>>> Signed,
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> Etc.
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>>
>>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance