[governance] US Congress & the JPA

[George Sadowsky]

All:

The bottom of the web  page:


http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1642:energy-and-commerce-subcommittee-hearing-on-oversight-of-the-internet-corporation-for-assigned-names-and-numbers-icann&catid=134:subcommittee-on-communications-technology-and-the-internet&Itemid=74


contains pointers  to both streaming and downloadable versions of the 
entire hearing.

I found the hearing quite revealing, for its content, for the amount 
of misunderstanding of basic facts, for the lack of understanding of 
opposing viewpoints, and for some very coherent and perceptive things 
that were said.

3 hours, 1.5 gigabytes.  I don't know if a transcript exists, but the 
video contains interesting body language that a transcript would not 
convey.

George

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~





At 2:46 PM +0200 6/5/09, William Drake wrote:
>This doesn't sound promising from the perspective of immediate 
>terminators.  Shared concerns, different conclusions.
>
>
>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/06/internet-group-skewered-by-hou.php
>
>
>THURSDAY, JUNE 4, 2009
>
>Internet Group Skewered By Lawmakers
>
>A chorus of House Energy and Commerce Communications Subcommittee 
>members today called for an extension of the U.S. government's 
>formal oversight agreement with the nonprofit that administers the 
>Internet domain name system, citing concerns about the 11-year-old 
>organization's transparency, accountability, budget processes, and 
>stakeholder affairs. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and 
>Numbers remains "far from a model of effective and sustainable 
>self-governance" and it would be unwise to shrink the federal 
>government's role amid increased cyber attacks and rapid Internet 
>innovation, Rep.John Dingell, D-Mich., said at a hearing. 
>Subcommittee ranking member Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., Mike Doyle, 
>D-Pa., John Shimkus, R-Ill., and Lee Terry, R-Neb., each backed the 
>extension of a joint project agreement between ICANN and the 
>National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
>
>"ICANN seems better at furthering its own interests than those of 
>the millions of Internet users it's supposed to look out for," Doyle 
>said. Terry and others emphasized the issue is a matter of national 
>security and must be examined carefully." Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., 
>said ICANN does not have the independent, authoritative governance 
>structure to keep other governments from abusing their power to 
>interfere with Internet governance and citizens' use of the 
>platform. Subcommittee Chairman Rick Boucher, D-Va., is reportedly 
>drafting a letter to NTIA with the backing of Stearns and Energy and 
>Commerce ranking member Joe Barton that recommends a one-year 
>extension of the agreement. Boucher told Tech Daily Dose after the 
>hearing that he had not made a firm decision on how to proceed but 
>would be doing so in the near future.
>
>ICANN President Paul Twomey insisted his group has improved its 
>operation and has "passed the test" proposed in its original 1998 
>arrangement with NTIA that a multi-stakeholder, private sector led 
>could perform a narrow technical function. He also pointed out that 
>a separate NTIA-ICANN deal pertaining to the global coordination of 
>the domain name system's backbone and IP address allocation, which 
>is the "key instrument of oversight," will not sunset. Twomey also 
>warned that any temporary extension of the JPA will send a signal 
>internationally that the U.S. government does not have faith in 
>ICANN's industry driven model. For years, some foreign governments 
>and stakeholders have called for alternatives to the existing 
>governance structure like oversight by the United Nations or other 
>international bodies.
>
>Christine Jones, general counsel for Web hosting company GoDaddy, 
>said ICANN has made great progress toward achieving the goals laid 
>out as part of its formation but has "not yet achieved the 
>competition or bottom-up representation called for" in its bylaws. 
>Her company believes the JPA must not only be extended but also 
>revised to include openness and transparency as overall guiding 
>principles, she said. NTIA Associate Administrator Fiona Alexander 
>told the subcommittee that regardless of whether the JPA is 
>terminated, modified, or extended, her agency will be active as part 
>of ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee and by filing comments in 
>various public consultations.
>
>Twomey also pledged not to move forward on ICANN's introduction of 
>new top-level domains, such as .biz, .info, and .us, until 
>fraud-related fears by brand owners are addressed. ICANN plans to 
>begin accepting applications for new domains in early 2010, which 
>could bring in an initial $90 million for ICANN plus steep renewal 
>fees. As a result, businesses and consumers will face higher 
>Internet-related costs, Verizon Associate General Counsel Sarah 
>Deutsch said. "ICANN has acknowledged concerns but has not 
>adequately addressed them," she said, suggesting the group 
>commission an impartial study of the domain name marketplace to 
>gauge whether there is a need for hundreds of new domains and 
>whether proposed changes would guard against cyber-squatting, fraud, 
>and confusion.
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance