[governance] JPA - final draft for comments

[McTim]

On 6/4/09, carlos a. afonso <ca at rits.org.br> wrote:
> Yes, even better.

A) if you carry on top posting we won't know what you are referring to.

B) if it's this:

> > I would of course like it even better if all of us can agree that
>  > "JPA
>  > should end and a we agree on an MOU for a transition'.

Well, that's just bizarre.  "End it, but transition to something else
unspecified with a MoU to another unspecified party"?

Do we not want to be taken seriously?  Seriously!?!

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance