[governance] JPA - final draft for comments

[carlos a. afonso]

Yes, even better.

--c.a.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Carlos A. Afonso
Rits - Rede de Informações para o Terceiro Setor
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


-----Original Message-----
From: Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>
To: Carlos Afonso <ca at rits.org.br>
Cc: Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu>,  "governance at lists.cpsr.org"
<governance at lists.cpsr.org>, William Drake
<william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch>,  Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:05:03 +0530
Subject: Re: [governance] JPA - final draft for comments

> I would of course like it even better if all of us can agree that
> "JPA 
> should end and a we agree on an MOU for a transition'.
> 
> this language is even clearer and more powerful.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Carlos Afonso wrote:
> > Dear Lee,
> >
> > Lee W McKnight wrote:
> > [...]
> >   
> >> Seriously, in the next A or U there could be a mandate for
> >> participation in a transition process, with of course USG
> >> noncommittal to the conclusion of the transition process, until
> that
> >> end state is defined more precisely than it is today. Maybe that's
> >> what we advocate, end the JPA and agree on an MOU for a
> transition?
> >>
> >> Lee
> >>     
> >
> >
> > I agree this is a realistic prospect. It of course does not mean we
> > should not express our position (with the obvious educated guesses
> on
> > what our chances are) -- this is how political "negotiations" go...
> >
> > frt rgds
> >
> > --c.a.
> >
> >
> >   


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance