[governance] JPA - final draft for comments

[Parminder]

I would of course like it even better if all of us can agree that "JPA 
should end and a we agree on an MOU for a transition'.

this language is even clearer and more powerful.





Carlos Afonso wrote:
> Dear Lee,
>
> Lee W McKnight wrote:
> [...]
>   
>> Seriously, in the next A or U there could be a mandate for
>> participation in a transition process, with of course USG
>> noncommittal to the conclusion of the transition process, until that
>> end state is defined more precisely than it is today. Maybe that's
>> what we advocate, end the JPA and agree on an MOU for a transition?
>>
>> Lee
>>     
>
>
> I agree this is a realistic prospect. It of course does not mean we
> should not express our position (with the obvious educated guesses on
> what our chances are) -- this is how political "negotiations" go...
>
> frt rgds
>
> --c.a.
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20090604/e87ff2c7/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance