[governance] JPA - final draft for comments

Carlos Afonso ca at rits.org.br
Wed Jun 3 11:36:42 EDT 2009


Dear Lee,

Lee W McKnight wrote:
[...]
> Seriously, in the next A or U there could be a mandate for
> participation in a transition process, with of course USG
> noncommittal to the conclusion of the transition process, until that
> end state is defined more precisely than it is today. Maybe that's
> what we advocate, end the JPA and agree on an MOU for a transition?
> 
> Lee


I agree this is a realistic prospect. It of course does not mean we
should not express our position (with the obvious educated guesses on
what our chances are) -- this is how political "negotiations" go...

frt rgds

--c.a.

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list