[governance] IGF Review Process Consensus Statement

[Jeremy Malcolm]

On 02/06/2009, at 4:44 AM, Ginger Paque wrote:

> Since the value and effectiveness of the IGF are obvious, with
> near-unanimous response that it should continue, we believe that the  
> review should focus on addressing the issue of more inclusive  
> participation. To do so, governments must be motivated to  
> participate fully in the IGF process. We ask whether a more  
> substantial output in the form of a statement, recommendations or  
> guidelines would catalyze this engagement.

I would add "This may in turn require the reconsideration of a format  
for outcome-focussed discussions that would facilitate the generation  
of such an output document - for example, the roundtables that were  
originally considered for the Sharm El Sheikh meeting."

-- 
JEREMY MALCOLM
Project Coordinator
CONSUMERS INTERNATIONAL-KL OFFICE
for Asia Pacific and the Middle East	

Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM
7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg
TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
Mob: +60 12 282 5895
Fax: +60 3 7726 8599
www.consumersinternational.org

Consumers International (CI) is the only independent global  
campaigning voice for consumers. With over 220 member organisations in  
115 countries, we are building a powerful international consumer  
movement to help protect and empower consumers everywhere. For more  
information, visit www.consumersinternational.org.

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance