[governance] FW: Re: An Attached "Edited" Document

[Ginger Paque]

Michael, I am just reading your draft. This is invaluable, and I 
appreciate it more than i can say...

Does this mean the final draft just sent takes Bill's comments into account?

Michael Gurstein wrote:
>
> <<...>> <<...>>
> Okay, in response to Bill...
>
> I'm in the process of editing a couple of books, the next issue of the 
> Community Informatics journal etc.etc. so I inevitably read with a red 
> pencil in my hand.
>
> What I've done in the attached is edit the statement as I would edit 
> any other publication for which I'm responsible--for grammar, 
> redundancy, excessive opinionizing etc.etc.
>
> Thus in the attached are some both editorial and content judgements 
> that are generally not very controversial but in some cases are (I 
> have dropped most of "opinining" stuff in $3 and the specific's from #6
>
> I'm sending this along in a marked up and a clear version…
>
> (I'm off -- editing what I should be editing for most of the day… feel 
> free to do with this as appropriate.
>
> Best,
>
> M
>
> Michael Gurstein, Ph.D.
> Editor in Chief: The Journal of Community Informatics
> _http://ci-journal.net_ <http://ci-journal.net/>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance