[governance] National Assembly NA body for transparent cyber laws - Pakistan

[Fouad Bajwa]

http://www.dawnnews.tv/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/sci-tech/16-a-body-for-transparent-cyber-laws-hs-06

ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly Standing Committee on Information
Technology and Telecommu-nications has called for transparency,
stricter laws and thorough investigation to protect users’ data in
‘Prevention of Electronic Crimes Ordinance (PECO) 2008’.

The committee which met here at the National Assembly Secretariat
endorsed the dissent note by Anusha Rehman Khan and Marvi Memon on the
ordinance.

Ms Rehman told the NA body that the PECO in its current form violated
the fundamental rights of the people.

She said the cyber law had wide ranging, unchecked investigatory
powers, search and seizure of personal and corporate data, adding that
it could take years to prove the offence.

She said under the current law search and seizure could take place
anytime and anywhere on any number of IT systems.

The legislator said an accused had no legal guarantees that the
computers taken into custody would not be implanted with false
evidence or the data in computers would not be lost or damaged.

Regarding Article 10, the first provision to the Section 25 of PECO,
she told the body that the government could devise the procedure for
investigation and prosecution of offences under the Cyber Law 2008.

Ms Rehman pointed out that the PECO created fictional category of
additional ‘electronic offences’ that would lead effectively to double
punishment for the same offences like forgery, cheating, causing
damage to an IT system. Thus, a person could be charged both under
relevant sections and under the PECO.

The ordinance also did not provide any protection to the property
rights, she said, adding that no principles for compensations for such
property loss were stated in the law.

Ms Rehman said the sophisticated IT equipment and technical training
programmes were required for investigation agencies.  “A law is only
required to cover two to three offences that are not covered elsewhere
e.g. spamming, spoofing,” she added.

-- 

Regards.
--------------------------
Fouad Bajwa
@skBajwa
Answering all your technology questions
http://www.askbajwa.com
http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance