[governance] FCC Chair & NN

["Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"]

FYI
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/12/AR2009011203610.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter
 
wolfgang

________________________________

Von: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at acm.org]
Gesendet: Di 13.01.2009 15:09
An: Governance List
Betreff: Re: [governance] Re: What is Network Neutrality




On 13 Jan 2009, at 01:48, Parminder wrote:

> >
> > Option 2. Telecoms are absolutely barred from charging content 
> providers for
> > any special treatment of their content, i.e. we do not have a tiered
> > Internet, with different quality and speed of delivery of content 
> as per
> > different charges.
> >
> >
I have gotten a little confused in this discussion.   So this email is 
as much to try and understand the position as to perhaps make a small 
point based on my possibl flawed understanding

If I read this correctly the prohibition is only against doing this to 
content providers.

Not included is doing this to other service providers and no 
prohibition against doing this to consumers. (perhaps the upstream 
downstream distinction someone was making though I do not think it 
maps perfectly).  I.e. Access providers can provide different service 
levels for those who are happy with best effort for their email and 
occasional surfing and for those who require high bandwidth with ultra 
low latency for playing massive online distributed games.

Is that correct?

I think that is unavoidable.  One complexity with that is if the 
premium service they provide starve the best effort pipes.  I am not 
sure how that fits into the puzzle.

Also I wonder how this is handled when a content provider who provides 
a small amount  of content in a periodic newsletter and only uses a 
trickle of uploading bandwidth while a providers of on demand videos 
are using  large amounts of latency sensitive bandwidth.  Should they 
be given the same access and be charged the same?

It seems to me that there needs to be a line between differentiating 
because of the nature of content or the business relationship with a 
content provider (NN) and differentiating based on amount and type of 
bandwidth used (something else).

And while one can reasonably be an activist on content NN, and/or an 
activist for 'sufficient' best-effort-access for all at an affordable 
price (or even free), they are not the same struggles.


a.

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance