[governance] What is Network Neutrality
George Sadowsky
george.sadowsky at attglobal.net
Thu Jan 8 10:01:52 EST 2009
All,
I like very much Carlos' suggested approach of focusing on net
neutrality. In addition to addressing edge-content manipulation by
ISPs for whatever reason, it addresses the issue where (1) XXX is a
government, and packets in one or both directions may just end up in
the gulag (and sometimes with their senders and recipients, too!);
and (2) the potentially more beneficial case where SIPs are trying to
do spam control or other damage control of some kind. Note that this
would also diversion of traffic to alternate recipients, or simply
inspection of traffic in transit (e.g. the Great Chinese Firewall)
There are, of course, different definitions of net neutrality, and
there are some thoughtful and challenging papers that address the
subject. It's probably worth at least establishing and contrasting
definitions, but more important, understanding what they imply for
users in areas such as privacy, confidentiality, and accuracy. I
agree with Carlos in that much of what I've seen does not concentrate
upon implications for the user.
I have never seen from an ISP a clear statement by an ISP of what the
ISP does with respect to traffic manipulation (if anything), and I
would think that a reasonable goal should be to establish a framework
that allows/requires an ISP to declare, in simple language or
languages, its policies with respect to content manipulation and
delivery. This is most necessary and useful at the local level,
where there is one path to the user's computer. Although higher tier
ISPs have the capability to make the same declaration, it's not
useful to the user in that the routes traversed by packets are likely
to belong to multiple carriers and in theory may even vary, packet by
packet.
This is a REAL Internet governance topic.
Regards,
George
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At 12:34 PM -0200 1/8/09, Carlos Afonso wrote:
>Regarding the growing drive for doing ever more complex analyses under
>the "net neutrality" umbrella, I would recommend Sandvig's article
>(unfortunately, the English version is available for a price at
>http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mcb/272/2007/00000009/F0020002/art00012),
>which we have just published in Portuguese in our magazine poliTICs
>(www.politics.org.br). If you can manage Portuguese, please download the
>PDF version under a CC licence from the site.
>
>In reading the recent contributions (including Sandvig's), I feel most
>if not all of them do not take the user approach to NN in consideration.
>I mean, I am sitting at a home in X city in Y state in Z country using
>XXX ADSL operator and such and such things which seem to reveal packet
>manipulation of some sort on the part of the XXX operator is happening.
>How do I deal with it, what are the legal/regulatory handles (or lack
>thereof) I can use to protect myself against such manipulation, what
>political involvement I should consider to change this (thinking of the
>brainers who try and write action-oriented papers) and so on.
>
>However, in any case and whatever the approach, I insist in considering
>NN (whatever the name you wish to choose for it) a key topic for IGF.
>
>frt rgds
>
>--c.a.
>
-----------------<<snip>>-----------------------
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
George Sadowsky george.sadowsky at gmail.com
2182 Birch Way george.sadowsky at attglobal.net
Woodstock, VT 05091-8155 http://www.georgesadowsky.org/
tel: +1.802.457.3370 GSM mobile: +1.202.415.1933
Voice mail & fax: +1.203.547.6020 Grand Central:
+1.202.370.7734
SKYPE: sadowsky
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list