RES: [governance] CONSENSUS CALL - IGF ROLE

[Vanda Scartezini UOL]

I do agree! IGF hardly started his real work. I believe next IGF shall start to set up the "who is responsible for" to implement some conclusions, and it will be necessary more time to get reasonable results which make difference for the people around the world.
'regards



Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Alameda Santos 1470 #1407
Tel - +55113266.6253
Mob- +55118181.1464
vanda at uol.com.br
  Before print think about the Environment
"The information contained in this message - and attached files - is restricted, and its confidentiality protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and notify the sender immediately. Please be advised that the improper use of the aforementioned information will create grounds for legal action."

"As informações existentes nesta mensagem e nos arquivos anexados são para uso restrito, com sigilo protegido por lei. Caso não seja o destinatário, favor apagar esta mensagem e notificar o remetente. O uso impróprio das informações desta mensagem será tratado conforme a legislação em vigor."



-----Mensagem original-----
De: Graciela Selaimen [mailto:graciela at rits.org.br] 
Enviada em: terça-feira, 17 de fevereiro de 2009 14:00
Para: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Ian Peter
Assunto: Re: [governance] CONSENSUS CALL - IGF ROLE

Hello,

I support both statements.


best,
Graciela Selaimen

Ian Peter escreveu:
>
> We also need to get a consensus on the following statement which, 
> depending on the flow of the consultations, may be delivered with or 
> separately to the statement on the IGF review.
>
>  
>
> Please indicate YES or NO in response. If responding no and can 
> articulate why, we may be able to accommodate suggestions even at this 
> late stage.
>
>  
>
> STATEMENT
>
>  
>
>  
>
> The Internet Governance Caucus is of the view that the IGF should 
> continue beyond its first mandated period of five years.
>
>  
>
> There are two clear, and relatively distinct, mandates of the IGF -  
> first, regarding public policy functions, as a forum for 
> multistakeholder policy dialogue, and second, regarding capacity 
> building. Both aspects of the IGF's role need to be strengthened.
>
>  
>
> Especially, one role (for instance, capacity building) should not be 
> promoted to the exclusion of the other (policy related role). If the 
> IGF is assessed not to be sufficiently contributing to its one or the 
> other principal roles, adequate measures should be considered to 
> improve its effectivenesses vis-a-vis that role.
>
>  
>
> It is important that IGF remains open to addressing all issues that 
> are in the IG space, no matter how controversial. Very likely, the 
> more controversial an issue, the more appropriate it may be to bring 
> it to the IGF where inputs from a diverse range of stakeholders can be 
> sought.
>
>  
>
> Deliberations at the IGF can be used as inputs for global Internet 
> policy making, which will help make policy-making processes more 
> participative and democratic.
>
>  
>
> We congratulate the IGF secretariat on doing exemplary work in the 
> last few years, However for this success to be built on, the IGF 
> should be assured stable and sufficient public funding to be able to 
> carry its functions effectively, and impartially in global public 
> interest. To this end we believe it is important that no other UN 
> organization gets involved in the IGF's management.
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Ian Peter
>
> PO Box 429
>
> Bangalow NSW 2479
>
> Australia
>
> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
>
> www.ianpeter.com
>
>  
>
>  
>

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance