[governance] CONSENSUS CALL - IGF ROLE

Graciela Selaimen graciela at rits.org.br
Tue Feb 17 12:00:13 EST 2009


Hello,

I support both statements.


best,
Graciela Selaimen

Ian Peter escreveu:
>
> We also need to get a consensus on the following statement which, 
> depending on the flow of the consultations, may be delivered with or 
> separately to the statement on the IGF review.
>
>  
>
> Please indicate YES or NO in response. If responding no and can 
> articulate why, we may be able to accommodate suggestions even at this 
> late stage.
>
>  
>
> STATEMENT
>
>  
>
>  
>
> The Internet Governance Caucus is of the view that the IGF should 
> continue beyond its first mandated period of five years.
>
>  
>
> There are two clear, and relatively distinct, mandates of the IGF -  
> first, regarding public policy functions, as a forum for 
> multistakeholder policy dialogue, and second, regarding capacity 
> building. Both aspects of the IGF's role need to be strengthened.
>
>  
>
> Especially, one role (for instance, capacity building) should not be 
> promoted to the exclusion of the other (policy related role). If the 
> IGF is assessed not to be sufficiently contributing to its one or the 
> other principal roles, adequate measures should be considered to 
> improve its effectivenesses vis-a-vis that role.
>
>  
>
> It is important that IGF remains open to addressing all issues that 
> are in the IG space, no matter how controversial. Very likely, the 
> more controversial an issue, the more appropriate it may be to bring 
> it to the IGF where inputs from a diverse range of stakeholders can be 
> sought.
>
>  
>
> Deliberations at the IGF can be used as inputs for global Internet 
> policy making, which will help make policy-making processes more 
> participative and democratic.
>
>  
>
> We congratulate the IGF secretariat on doing exemplary work in the 
> last few years, However for this success to be built on, the IGF 
> should be assured stable and sufficient public funding to be able to 
> carry its functions effectively, and impartially in global public 
> interest. To this end we believe it is important that no other UN 
> organization gets involved in the IGF's management.
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Ian Peter
>
> PO Box 429
>
> Bangalow NSW 2479
>
> Australia
>
> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
>
> www.ianpeter.com
>
>  
>
>  
>

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list