[governance] CONSENSUS CALL - IGF ROLE

Fouad Bajwa fouadbajwa at gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 05:44:07 EST 2009


Yes for both statements.

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
> We also need to get a consensus on the following statement which, depending
> on the flow of the consultations, may be delivered with or separately to the
> statement on the IGF review.
>
>
>
> Please indicate YES or NO in response. If responding no and can articulate
> why, we may be able to accommodate suggestions even at this late stage.
>
>
>
> STATEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
> The Internet Governance Caucus is of the view that the IGF should continue
> beyond its first mandated period of five years.
>
>
>
> There are two clear, and relatively distinct, mandates of the IGF -  first,
> regarding public policy functions, as a forum for multistakeholder policy
> dialogue, and second, regarding capacity building. Both aspects of the IGF's
> role need to be strengthened.
>
>
>
> Especially, one role (for instance, capacity building) should not be
> promoted to the exclusion of the other (policy related role). If the IGF is
> assessed not to be sufficiently contributing to its one or the other
> principal roles, adequate measures should be considered to improve its
> effectivenesses vis-a-vis that role.
>
>
>
> It is important that IGF remains open to addressing all issues that are in
> the IG space, no matter how controversial. Very likely, the more
> controversial an issue, the more appropriate it may be to bring it to the
> IGF where inputs from a diverse range of stakeholders can be sought.
>
>
>
> Deliberations at the IGF can be used as inputs for global Internet policy
> making, which will help make policy-making processes more participative and
> democratic.
>
>
>
> We congratulate the IGF secretariat on doing exemplary work in the last few
> years, However for this success to be built on, the IGF should be assured
> stable and sufficient public funding to be able to carry its functions
> effectively, and impartially in global public interest. To this end we
> believe it is important that no other UN organization gets involved in the
> IGF's management.
>
>
>
>
>
> Ian Peter
>
> PO Box 429
>
> Bangalow NSW 2479
>
> Australia
>
> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
>
> www.ianpeter.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>



-- 

Regards.
--------------------------
Fouad Bajwa
@skBajwa
Answering all your technology questions
http://www.askbajwa.com
http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list