[governance] CONSENSUS CALL - IGF ROLE

[iliya.bazlyankov at regia.bg]

Yes to both statements.

Iliya Bazlyankov

iliya.bazlyankov at regia.bg

On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:28:13 +1100, "Ian Peter" <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>
wrote:
> We also need to get a consensus on the following statement which,
depending
> on the flow of the consultations, may be delivered with or separately to
> the
> statement on the IGF review.
> 
> 
> 
> Please indicate YES or NO in response. If responding no and can
articulate
> why, we may be able to accommodate suggestions even at this late stage.
> 
> 
> 
> STATEMENT
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The Internet Governance Caucus is of the view that the IGF should
continue
> beyond its first mandated period of five years.
> 
> 
> 
> There are two clear, and relatively distinct, mandates of the IGF - 
> first,
> regarding public policy functions, as a forum for multistakeholder policy
> dialogue, and second, regarding capacity building. Both aspects of the
> IGF's
> role need to be strengthened.
> 
> 
> 
> Especially, one role (for instance, capacity building) should not be
> promoted to the exclusion of the other (policy related role). If the IGF
> is
> assessed not to be sufficiently contributing to its one or the other
> principal roles, adequate measures should be considered to improve its
> effectivenesses vis-a-vis that role.
> 
> 
> 
> It is important that IGF remains open to addressing all issues that are
in
> the IG space, no matter how controversial. Very likely, the more
> controversial an issue, the more appropriate it may be to bring it to the
> IGF where inputs from a diverse range of stakeholders can be sought.
> 
> 
> 
> Deliberations at the IGF can be used as inputs for global Internet policy
> making, which will help make policy-making processes more participative
> and
> democratic.
> 
> 
> 
> We congratulate the IGF secretariat on doing exemplary work in the last
> few
> years, However for this success to be built on, the IGF should be assured
> stable and sufficient public funding to be able to carry its functions
> effectively, and impartially in global public interest. To this end we
> believe it is important that no other UN organization gets involved in
the
> IGF's management.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ian Peter
> 
> PO Box 429
> 
> Bangalow NSW 2479
> 
> Australia
> 
> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
> 
> www.ianpeter.com

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance