[governance] Co-coordinator Election Results
Fearghas McKay
fm-lists at st-kilda.org
Mon Dec 21 18:13:09 EST 2009
On 21 Dec 2009, at 15:08, Craig Simon wrote:
> FYI, like STV, the system I've been developing emphasizes ranked
> choice voting. It uses a combination of Borda Count and Instant
> Runoff Voting algorithms to tabulate results.
One of the advantages of STV is it that it is relatively simple to
explain, but even then it usually needs an explanation to a
significant percentage of the electorate.
Is the addition of Borda Count & Runoff Voting algorithms were the
extra complexity of explaining ? Is Better the enemy of Good Enough?
Simplicity is always easier to sell and understand - once you start
talking about Borda Counts et al I get confused and I am involved with
running elections most years for co-chairs/fellow directors.
For occasional electors complex voting systens are a barrier to
understanding and believing in the election process, in my opinion.
Perhaps even for regular electors.
Regards
f
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list