[governance] Rules decide Membership not existing Members
Roland Perry
roland at internetpolicyagency.com
Tue Aug 25 07:59:05 EDT 2009
In message <12EB41C3-5936-4E2E-9756-DF99B959CB61 at st-kilda.org>, at
12:44:51 on Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Fearghas McKay <fm-lists at st-kilda.org>
writes
>> That's what Capture is about, and any sensible entity will have anti-
>>capture rules.
>
>My concern about the capture rules which are fine in principle is the
>the fact that you may not be able to vote on charter changes for a
>random period of time ranging from just over 2 months to 14 months.
I agree that any rules should be followed properly, and doing that may
require a more regular "count" of who is a member and who isn't.
Something for the co-ordinators to consider.
--
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list