[governance] Monroe Doctrin for Cyberspace?
Karl Auerbach
karl at cavebear.com
Mon Aug 17 20:20:04 EDT 2009
On 08/17/2009 01:14 PM, Paul Lehto wrote:
> One of the more powerful things in defense of the expansion of human
> freedom and equality...
One of the best ways to assure that a child fails is to require that
child to compete with adults.
Internet governance is a child.
It is far, far too soon to engage on human rights issues as subjects of
governance - one may discuss them, but an attempt to set forth today to
build a supranational apparatus to protect those rights is likely to
crash and fail.
It is better that internet governance take child steps to address issues
that are more easily obtained, most particularly issues grounded in the
level of service of internet services.
To make this concrete, an aspect of internet governance might be to
establish service level definitions that must be met before a provider
can claim to be offering support for VoIP. These would include not only
bandwidth, delay, and jitter measures but also non-discrimination and
privacy standards and a definition of what "management" measures are
considered appropriate and what are not.
In the DNS space, internet governance efforts could have success in
doing that which ICANN has not: the establishment of criteria for DNS
root (and perhaps some TLD) providers in terms of their ability to turn
DNS query packets into DNS response packets, establishing metrics of
availability, responsivity, privacy, and non-discrimination.
There is also plenty of room to address the difficult issue of how one
(whether that "one" be a person or a nation) to obtain assurances (not
guarantees) of adequate levels of packet transport to support proposed
applications. (For example, a nation that is considering a VoIP
infrastructure might be concerned about assurances that that
infrastructure can reach overseas.) Thus, internet governance issues
might address the establishment of a clearinghouse through which users
(and their agents) and providers might meet and arrange end-to-end
assurances (again, not guarantees.)
There is plenty of work to be done that can be done with success and
that can build credibility for a subsequent effort to deal with the more
difficult issues that are the focus of your note.
--karl--
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list