[governance] RP Workshop proposal final draft for consensus

[Marilia Maciel]

I support and agree with this proposal.
Best regards,

Marília

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:47 PM, raquelgatto <raquelgatto at uol.com.br> wrote:

> I also support the RP workshop!
>
> Raquel
>
> Em 20/04/2009 04:44, *BAUDOUIN SCHOMBE < b.schombe at gmail.com >* escreveu:
>
>
> I am agree for this RP Workshop proposal
>
> Baudouin
>
> 2009/4/18 Ginger Paque :
> > I  propose this as a final draft for the RP Workshop:
> >
> > 1. Propose a title for a workshop (not more then 10 words)
> >
> > Remote Participation: mapping the field, evaluation and multistakeholder
> > involvement
> >
> > 2. Provide a concise description of the workshop (not more than 200
> words)
> >
> > At the IGF Hyderabad, the Remote Participation Working Group and the IGF
> > Secretariat coordinated with local partners in the creation of IGF hubs
> and
> > support for Remote Participation in the IGF main event. Since then, the
> > debate about remote participation has gained momentum.
> >
> > Nonetheless, stakeholders must review: a) How they can benefit from the
> > improve ment in remote participation possibilities at the IGF; b) what
> their
> > role is in the projects that aim to enhance remote participation; c) how
> > stakeholders can work synergistically in order to implement remote
> > participation.
> >
> > The workshop will discuss remote participation both from a policy (what
> > should be done) and a best practices approach (what has been done).
> >
> > Policy:
> >
> > 1- Mapping the field of remote participation. Identify the
> > impelling/institutional arrangements where remote participation is most
> > needed. Identify additional prospective stakeholders that should be
> involved
> > in this initiative and how to engage them.
> >
> > 2- Global and regional fora and issues
> >
> > 3- Inclusion of people from developing countries
> >
> > 4- Inclusion of people with disabilities.
> >
> > Best practices:
> >< br />> 1- Best practices at the IGF: an evaluation (including remote
> hubs)
>
> >
> > 2- Guidelines for RP at the IGF: a step towards a code of best practices
> in
> > the field of remote participation?
> >
> >
> >
> > 3. Does the workshop fall under any of the five broad IGF Themes
> (Critical
> > Internet Resources, Openness, Security, Access, Diversity) or under the
> > cross-cutting priorities (development, capacity building)? If so which
> one?
> > (Please select the most appropriate one.)
> >
> > Capacity Building
> >
> > Capacity development must be seen both as a precondition and as an
> outcome
> > of remote participation. The involvement of a broader range of
> stakeholders
> > on the Internet Governance debate, particularly those from developing
> > countries, will have a positive impact on their abilities to follow and
> to
> > intervene in global and regional debates. Building Capacity in this area
> > will foster access, openness and diversity in international policy
> > processes.
> >
> >
> >
> > 4.Have you organized an IGF workshop before? If so, please provide the
> link
> > to the report.
> >
> > IGC has organized the following workshops
> >
> > “Internet for all – Exploring a rights-based approach” Available at:
> >
> >
> http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/index.php/2008-igf-hyderabad/event-reports/72
> > workshops/345-internet-for-all-exploring-a-rights-based-approach
> >
> > “ The transboundary Internet: jurisdiction, control and sovereignty”
> > Available at:
> >
> >
> http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/index.php/2008-igf-hyderabad/event-reports/72-workshops/392-workshop-85-the-transboundary-internet-jurisdiction-control-and-sovereignty
> >
> >
> >
> > 5. Would you like to organize the workshop yo urself?
> >
> > 1. If so, who would you approach as co-organizers ?
> >
> > The Remote Participation Working Group (RPWG) and the Internet Governance
> > Caucus (IGC)
> >
> > We suggest approaching DiploFoundation as well. DiploFoundation has
> > organized and reported on a number of Capacity Building and other
> workshops.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ginger
> >
> >
> >
> > Ms. Virginia (Ginger) Paque
> >
> > DiploFoundation
> >
> > Coordinator IGCBP 09
> >
> >
> >
> > www.diplomacy.edu/ig
> >
> > VirginiaP at diplomacy.edu
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > To be removed from the list, send any mess age to:
> >     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> >
> > For all list information and functions, see:
> >     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN
> COORDONNATEUR NATIONAL REPRONTIC
> COORDONNATEUR SOUS REGIONAL ACSIS/AFRIQUE CENTRALE
> MEMBRE FACILITATEUR GAID AFRIQUE
> téléphone fixe: +243 1510 34 91
> Téléphone mobile:+243998983491/+243999334571
> email:b.schombe at gmail.com <email%3Ab.schombe at gmail.com>
> http://akimambo.unblog.fr
> http://educticafrique.ning.com/
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20090421/f71fef7a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance