[governance] Statement to OC meeting in May regarding Final draft for mailling?

[Ginger Paque]

I propose that we approve this final draft for emailing to the Secretariat
now:

The Internet Governance Caucus notes the statement from the Programme Paper:
"...Some favoured the inclusion of 'Internet rights and principles' as a
cross-cutting theme". This concurs with the widespread support for this
concept from various stakeholder groups at the February open consultations.

However we are concerned at the proposal to exclude it as a theme this year
on the grounds that there is "no established definition of this theme and
that therefore it should not be discussed at the Sharm El Sheikh meeting."

We are surprised by this reasoning for exclusion and request that the MAG
revisit this subject given the wide support which has been expressed. Given
that these matters are specifically contained in the Tunis Agenda (paras 70
and 42) we do not see lack of definition as a reason for exclusion. However,
if it is not possible to include this concept until it is defined within
IGF, we ask that the IGF 2009 include a prominent plenary space to establish
this definition, in preparation for more comprehensive discussions in future
debates and meetings.

Ginger 

Ms. Virginia (Ginger) Paque

DiploFoundation

Coordinator IGCBP 09

 

www.diplomacy.edu/ig

VirginiaP at diplomacy.edu



Ginger

 

Ms. Virginia (Ginger) Paque

DiploFoundation

Coordinator IGCBP 09

 

www.diplomacy.edu/ig

VirginiaP at diplomacy.edu

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu] 
Enviado el: Viernes, 17 de Abril de 2009 09:16 a.m.
Para: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Ginger Paque
Asunto: RE: RV: [governance] Statement to OC meeting in May regarding

I have not carefully followed the debate leading up to this, but looking at
this statement with fresh eyes, I support it! If Jeanette has any further
concerns about pre-judging MAG positions, one could simply change "we are
concerned at the PROPOSAL..." to "we would not support any proposals..."

--MM

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> The Internet Governance Caucus notes the statement from the Programme
> Paper:
> "....Some favoured the inclusion of 'Internet rights and principles' as a
> cross-cutting theme". This concurs with the widespread support for this
> concept from various stakeholder groups at the February open
> consultations.
> 
> However we are concerned at the PROPOSAL to exclude it as a theme this
> year
> on the grounds that there is "no established definition of this theme and
> that therefore it should not be discussed at the Sharm El Sheikh meeting."
> 
> We are surprised by this reasoning for exclusion and request that the MAG
> revisit this subject given the wide support which has been expressed.
> Given
> that these matters are specifically contained in the Tunis Agenda (paras
> 70
> and 42) we do not see lack of definition as a reason for exclusion.
> However,
> if it is not possible to include this concept until it is defined within
> IGF, we ask that the IGF 2009 include a prominent plenary space to
> establish
> this definition, in preparation for more comprehensive discussions in
> future
> debates and meetings.
> 
> Ginger
> 
> Ms. Virginia (Ginger) Paque
> 
> DiploFoundation
> 
> Coordinator IGCBP 09
> 
> 
> 
> www.diplomacy.edu/ig
> 
> VirginiaP at diplomacy.edu
> 
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Carlos Afonso [mailto:ca at rits.org.br]
> Enviado el: Jueves, 16 de Abril de 2009 08:02 a.m.
> Para: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Jeanette Hofmann
> CC: Ginger Paque; 'Ian Peter'
> Asunto: Re: RV: [governance] Statement to OC meeting in May regarding
> "Internet
> 
> Jean, the report is not neutral, it reveals an attempted positioning
> derived from pressures which will continue. This is enough reason to be
> more proactive and point out the importante of discussing the theme.
> 
> --c.a.
> 
> Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
> > Hi Ginger, as I wrote before (email of late March),
> >
> > there is no decision to exclude rights and principles as a theme, and
> > even less so on the grounds that it is not properly defined. You quote
> > from a reporting section that summarizes a discussion of the MAG.
> >
> > It is important for us to explain why we want to see rights and
> > principles discussed but we should not generalize or misinterpret the
> > opinion of a minority of MAG members.
> >
> > jeanette
> >
> > Ginger Paque wrote:
> >> Here is a starting draft for discussion, please opine:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The Internet Governance Caucus notes the statement from the Programme
> >> Paper: "....Some favoured the inclusion of 'Internet rights and
> >> principles' as a cross-cutting theme". This concurs with the
> >> widespread support for this concept from various stakeholder groups
> >> at the February open consultations.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> However we are concerned at the decision to exclude it as a theme
> >> this year on the grounds that there is "no established definition of
> >> this theme and that therefore it should not be discussed at the Sharm
> >> El Sheikh meeting."
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We are surprised by this reasoning for exclusion and request that the
> >> MAG revisit this subject given the wide support which has been
> >> expressed. Given that these matters are specifically contained in the
> >> Tunis Agenda (paras 70 and 42) we do not see lack of definition as a
> >> reason for exclusion. However, if it is not possible to include this
> >> concept until it is defined within IGF, we ask that the IGF 2009
> >> include a prominent plenary space to establish this definition, in
> >> preparation for more comprehensive discussions in future debates and
> >> meetings.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> >     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> >
> > For all list information and functions, see:
> >     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> >
> >
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance