[governance] Consensus call on IGF review - YESor NO response

[Jacques Berleur]

I say YES to this staement on IGF Review.
But I would insist that if we contemplate IGFs at national or regional  
levels, we must also admit that some "nations" or "regions" are not as  
well equipped as others. We must also reflect on the benefit of the  
current international support, to be sure that the minorities' rights  
are safeguarded.
Thanks for your attention.
-- 
Jacques Berleur
Facultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix
61, rue de Bruxelles
B - 5000 NAMUR
URL: http://info.fundp.ac.be/~jbl



Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> a écrit :

> Here is the second statement we have been preparing, and the less
> controversial one. Again, a YES or NO response is required within 48 hours
> to meet the Secretariat's deadline.
>
>
> Review of the IGF
>
>
> The Tunis Agenda (TA) calls for examining "the desirability of the
> continuation of the Forum in formal consultation with Forum
> participants, within five years of its creation, and to make
> recommendations to the UN Membership..". In this regard, we have two
> sets of comments. One set is regarding the process of the 'examining' or
> review of the IGF, and another consists of our substantive comments on
> the role, mandate and structure of the IGF.
>
>
>
> Process of review
>
>



____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance