[governance] Inputs for synthesis paper

[Milton L Mueller]

> -----Original Message-----
> Now, the question is, would you agree to IGC making a statement that
> captures this 'reality' of contestation in a straightforward manner. 
> 
> Something like - 'While FoE and privacy rights are important 
> they may need to be balanced with considerations of cultural
diversity, 
> security etc'. or even  '....some think they need to be balanced
with...'

Yes, to the latter formulation. I.e., if we were seeking consensus on a
statement, I would have to agree with this formulation:

'While <some/many> in civil society believe FoE and privacy rights are
of paramount importance, others in CS think they need to be balanced
with considerations of cultural diversity,  security....'

How could I _not_ accept that as a true statement, one that attempts to
be fair to the people in the caucus who don't agree with me (and others)
about stronger FoE and privacy rights? 


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance