[governance] Re: Nomcom and conflict of interest
Suresh Ramasubramanian
suresh at hserus.net
Sat May 31 13:09:47 EDT 2008
Parminder [31/05/08 19:00 +0200]:
>I think our position is quite clear in our statement on MAG rotation
>developed for Feb 08 consultations of MAG (enclosed)
That much bandied about quote is not as clear as it should be. And it is
still inconsistent with the actions of the nomcom this time.
I thought that was the entire point of this discussion.
srs
>"We agree that the organizations having an important role in Internet
>administration and the development of Internet-related technical standards
>should continue to be represented in the MAG. However, their representation
>should not be at the expense of civil society participation."
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list