[governance] Re: Nomcom and conflict of interest

Suresh Ramasubramanian suresh at hserus.net
Sat May 31 13:09:47 EDT 2008


Parminder [31/05/08 19:00 +0200]:
>I think our position is quite clear in our statement on MAG rotation
>developed for Feb 08 consultations of MAG (enclosed)

That much bandied about quote is not as clear as it should be. And it is
still inconsistent with the actions of the nomcom this time.

I thought that was the entire point of this discussion.

	srs

>"We agree that the organizations having an important role in Internet
>administration and the development of Internet-related technical standards
>should continue to be represented in the MAG. However, their representation
>should not be at the expense of civil society participation."
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list