Remote participation plans Re: [OCDC] Re: [governance] Do we

linda misek-falkoff ldmisekfalkoff at gmail.com
Thu May 29 15:00:54 EDT 2008


Dear All,

I hope nothing's  crushed - because if I go back through archives there's
all that good educational material from the documentation when at the last
minute i couldn't go to Rio (siiiiiiiiiigh), but we interacted online in
chat rooms and plenary sidebars.  I thank you all for it and perhaps if you
wish could put something together on the topic.

Warm regards,
LDMF
*Respectful Interfaces*.

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Ken Lohento <klohento at panos-ao.org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> My two cents : I have to agree with Avri. To my knowledge the MAG didn't
> not take any decision to stop the OCDC (I can't remember neither any formal
> discussion about stopping a working group or DC). It's however true that
> some MAG members, who were members of this group, announced that they were
> leaving it (I understood they said it was not working properly).But there
> was no MAG decision about it.
>
> Rgds
>
> KL
>
> Avri Doria a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just wanted to point out a correction to Adam's original remark and
>> hence to Jeremy's comment n it.
>>
>> There never was a decision in Secretariat, nor any action, to remove  the
>> OCDC or to silence it in any way.  Many of the members of the group did quit
>> at one point, but as you will notice, the OCDC is still listed on the IGF's
>> DC page: http://www.intgovforum.org/Dynamic%20Coalitions.php . Ie. "the
>> MAG and Secretariat never stepped in."  I would note that there have not
>> been any postings in the OCDC (http://igf-online.net) other then from
>> Jeremy in a while.
>>
>> To my knowledge, neither the OCDC nor the "IGF Remote Participation
>> Working Group" mentioned by Ginger, have been barred from comment at any
>> meeting. In fact the OCDC made a report in Rio which, if I recall, Jeremy
>> read out
>> http://www.intgovforum.org/Rio_Meeting/IGF2-ReportingBack-15NOV07.txt,
>> and comments from the IGF Remote Participation WG were read out in Geneva at
>> the last consultations.
>>
>> Ginger's group, btw, has not yet asked to be listed as one of the DCs.  It
>> is my assumption that if this group wishes to be listed as one of the DCs,
>> it only needs to send information, in the same format as the other DCs, to
>> the IGF office with the request.
>>
>> a.
>>
>> On 27 May 2008, at 22:20, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
>>
>> On 27/05/2008, at 11:27 PM, Adam Peake wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> Jeremy, you and Kieren couldn't agree, had made no progress, your
>>>> dynamic coalition (I was a member) was a mess.  So the secretariat and MAG
>>>> stepped in.
>>>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>
>>  First, this is the first public acknowledgment I've seen of the concerted
>>> back-room move to crush the Online Collaboration Dynamic Coalition, as part
>>> of which you and the other MAG members who had been members of its mailing
>>> list left en masse.  It is a shame that you couldn't have been open about
>>> your intentions at the time.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>    governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>    governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>    governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>    governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20080529/e3e92c1f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


More information about the Governance mailing list