[governance] RE: organizational orientation
Adam Peake
ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Thu May 29 04:20:14 EDT 2008
>Let me take a different tack on this -
>
>My only reason for being on this list is because I believe it is important
>that the role of governments in particular in Internet governance be
>appropriately established - hence a UN initiative is very appropriate to
>move us away from
Ian, thanks, interesting comment. When you say:
>unilateral government control systems.
are you focusing on the root?
Thanks,
Adam
>And as we move away
>from the pioneer governance systems to something more appropriate
>multistakeholder becomes an important concept.
>
>I am not the slightest bit interested in ICANN. If I want to involve myself
>with RIRs I can do so already. To me, despite a few problems, they have good
>structures in place for what they do. I'd rather concentrate on the gaps and
>where we need something new, and appropriate roles for governments acting in
>concert, rather than turn this list into a catch-all for discussion and
>gripes on well structured existing institutions.
>
>ICANN and RIRs and IETF are the little picture. Let's look at the bigger
>picture of what is happening in this area and what needs to emerge. And
>where the gaps are in Internet governance.
>
>
>
>
>
>Ian Peter
>Ian Peter and Associates Pty Ltd
>PO Box 10670 Adelaide St Brisbane 4000
>Australia
>Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
>www.ianpeter.com
>www.internetmark2.org
>www.nethistory.info
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu]
>> Sent: 29 May 2008 06:50
>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Avri Doria
>> Subject: [governance] RE: organizational orientation
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at psg.com]
>> >
>> > while i agree that the IGF is one of the most visible IG foci
>> > for this caucus at the moment, i wonder whether it is the primary one.
>>
>> There is no doubt that IGF is the primary focus. This caucus generates
>> statements for submission to IGF, and nominates people to the IGF AG,
>> and serves as a focal point for the organization of workshops at IGF
>> annual meetings.
>>
>> ICANN is an often-discussed topic, yes. But this caucus has never
>> generated a statement to an ICANN meeting or process, never nominated
>> anyone for the numerous ICANN positions and never organized a workshop
>> for an ICANN meeting. As ICANN meetings approach, we do not see list
>> members telling each other who plans to be there. I would like to see
>> more people here get involved in ICANN processes directly; as chair of
>> the NCUC and an active participant in GNSO task forces and policy
>> development processes, I have often urged people here to get more
>> involved.
>>
>> RIRs are barely on the agenda here, though of course I wish more of us
>> were involved in that too. (By the way, a newcomer from this list
>> recently made a comment on the ARIN list and was instantly attacked by
>> Randy Bush. There was nothing particularly wrong or controversial about
>> the newcomers' comment, Bush was just being territorial and attempting
>> to make this person feel like an outsider. So be forwarned: while there
>> are numerous and quite sincere entreaties from the RIRs to get more
>> involved, there is still a very strong tribal element in those circles
>> that will not be happy when you do. But I expect that to change
>> gradually.)
>>
>> The EU is another area to keep an eye on. There are enough Europeans
>> here, and enough global impact of EU decisions, for that to be a proper
>> area of focus. And of course, we all must, for better or worse, pay
>> attention to aspects of US policy. As a principal of IGP I often wish
>> people in this group would respond more actively to efforts to respond
>> strategically to US actions that have global consequences (ICANN JPA
>> being an obvious case in point).
>>
>> Milton Mueller
>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
>> XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology
>> ------------------------------
>> Internet Governance Project:
> > http://internetgovernance.org
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.24.1/1470 - Release Date: 5/28/2008
>> 7:20 AM
>
>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
>For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list