[governance] What this debate is really about

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Let us put it this way.  

 

1.       What the nomcom advocated was a blanket exclusion 

2.       What you are proposing is a person by person, case by case
evaluation

 

So, which is it?   And if they have CS cred, and CS backgrounds, they are
CS, period - whoever their employer may be

 

                srs

 

From: Guru [mailto:guru at itforchange.net] 
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 12:12 PM
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; McTim
Cc: Carlos Afonso
Subject: Re: [governance] What this debate is really about

 

Suppose Kieren McCarthy, employee ICANN and Bertrand de La Chapelle, GAC
member representing French Govt (who are both I think members of this
mailing list) asked endorsement from IGC for MAG membership, do you think
IGC should endorse them? 

relationship (which many IGC members do have, such as Avri with IGF
secretariat) may be a very different situation, needing to be assessed
differently.



 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20080526/c6c2f6be/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance