[governance] IGC nominees for MAG

[Adam Peake]

>Adam,
>
>On 3/13/08 6:57 PM, "Adam Peake" <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
>
>>>  *Never having vocally advocated any positions that might have been
>>>  perceived to be 'controversial' in some unstated manner by some
>>>  unnamed group deemded to be more important, since such offenders
>>>  probably wouldn't be selected even with assurances of role/shape
>>>  shifting capacities (a CS-specific rule).
>>
>>
>>  That's a bit mean (Parminder, I'm still not irritated... )
>
>You may have missed my meaning, which was neither mean nor about one person.


Bill,

Then I don't understand what you meant.


>Please look again at the list in relation to all the criteria mentioned.
>http://www.nomadicity.net/IGC-candidates-for-IGF-MAG.html


I'm probably being dense, just don't get it.

Adam


>thanks,
>
>BD
>
>
>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
>To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
>For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance