"bridge", was Re: VS: [governance] Summary Report of IGF MAG

[Vittorio Bertola]

Avri Doria ha scritto:
> Part of this issue, if I understand correctly, comes out out of the the 
> numbers issue.  How many we get versus how many they get.   In terms of 
> the numbers issue on the MAG, personally I think that of the 20 places 
> not allocated to government choice, 10 should be people suggested by 
> private sector players and 10 should be from those recmmened by civil 
> society players.  I think within each of those groups there should be 
> people with all sorts of multiple identifications: as feminist, as youth 
> and elder advocacy, as pro private sector development, as pro public 
> sector development, as pro PPP development, as pro government, as 
> anarchist, as advocacy for the disabled, as South, North, East, and 
> West, pro Foss, pro IPR ...  and of course members of the internet 
> community and of academia and an even split between the genders.

I think that all groups should select people who are honest, are hard 
working and committed, are willing to listen, know what they are talking 
about from several standpoints, and have a personal and professional 
background as broad as possible.

So the people that the IGF should be looking for are exactly the ones 
that wouldn't fit into a rigid categorization.
-- 
vb.                   Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu   <--------
-------->  finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/  <--------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance