[governance] Internet Technical Community Background Document to OECD Ministerial

BAUDOUIN SCHOMBE b.schombe at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 06:52:18 EDT 2008


very interesting debate in which very little African takes part and yet the
problem of technical Community relates to all the countries of the world
without exception.

For my part these process testify to ignorance of these challenge in Africa
and also difficulty which we have to reach the Net with a good flow. In
Africa majority of Net using is done within the framework of service and
cybercafés. In some countries this use starts to be common in residence,
only in capitals or big cities. In services and cybercafés users are for
majority ignore name of navigator who allows them to sail on the fabric. Out
put the data processing specialists and impassioned technologies others have
for only concern of having access to their Web pages. For the case of the
data processing specialists they are more occupied making turn their
systems, to try to include/understand why the Net spends its time releasing
them where has to already allow an acceptable flow to employees. Under such
conditions it is difficult to take part in some important debate. Another
problem is channel of information moving. How much people and which are the
categories of people who have access to information in Africa?Another matter
come from numeric illiteracy.

debate on " technical community "' concept would deserve to be clearly
specified so to extend debate to multiactors engaged in challenge of Net of
future.
  Baudouin

2008/6/25 Michael Gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com>:

> Milton,
>
> A couple of points:
>        that the Technical Community produces a document with which CS
> agrees really has little to do with whether there should or should not be a
> separate Forum (or anything else)... Various groups produce all sorts of
> documents many of which others agree which doesn't mean that they should
> merge themselves into a common presentation mode.
>
>        from my observation the difference in the presenters and the topics
> of presentation at the TC Forum and the CS Forum were a sufficient argument
> to justify separate but equal and to a degree complimentary and mutually
> re-inforcing forums
>
> http://www.isoc.org/pubpolpillar/docs/itc_agenda_20080612.pdf
>
> http://thepublicvoice.org/events/seoul08/
>
> Perhaps a larger lesson there for this discussion?
>
> MG
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu]
> Sent: June 25, 2008 8:52 AM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Michael Gurstein
> Subject: RE: [governance] Internet Technical Community Background Document
> to OECD Ministerial
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Gurstein [mailto:gurstein at gmail.com]
> >
> > I'm not exactly sure how this might fit into the recent discussion
> > concerning the role of the Technical Community in CS but I would
> commend
> > those interested to a very interesting and useful document
> > prepared/presented by ISOC as a background paper to the OECD
> Ministerial
> > in
> > Seoul. http://www.isoc.org/pubpolpillar/docs/usercentric_en_2008.pdf
> It is
> > a
> > document with which I think, CS would have very little disagreement
> and
> > very
> > much to support.
>
> Well now. I don't want to sound crabby, I really don't.
>
> But one might ask, if the "technical community" produces documents that we
> agree mostly with, and if (as some self-identified spokespersons for it
> insist) they should be considered part of "civil society," then why did
> ISOC
> insist on having a separate OECD Stakeholder Forum from civil society?
>
> When the OECD process started, some of us in CS tried very hard to include
> ISOC and the "TC" in the same stakeholder forum. In fact we ended up with
> silos that segregated the two.
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>



-- 
SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN
COORDONNATEUR NATIONAL REPRONTIC
COORDONNATEUR SOUS REGIONAL ACSIS/AFRIQUE CENTRALE
MEMBRE FACILITATEUR GAID AFRIQUE
Tél:+243998983491
email:b.schombe at gmail.com <email%3Ab.schombe at gmail.com>
http://akimambo.unblog.fr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20080626/a5303725/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


More information about the Governance mailing list