[governance] nomcom's criteria - was multistakeholding

[Milton L Mueller]

I thought I had sent this last night but apparently didn't. 

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> 5. Criteria used by nomcom will be made public and will be reviewed by
> the caucus whenever possible before decisions are made

Let me add that in my opinion this would be a difficult if not
impossible rule to fulfill, and attempts to fulfill it are likely to
take a lot of time while providing meaningless results. 

In any tough selection process the _actual_ criteria used to select A
over B will emerge as the selections are being made. Oh of course they
can say things like "best qualified, most knowledgeable," or "regional
and gender balance," blah blah.  

So I agree with what Parminder said subsequently, " this level of
criteria writing may not necessary... however the nomcom should
certainly have clear directions from the IGC on this issue. The present
nomcom took that such directions already exist...."

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance