[governance] nomcom's creteria - was multistakeholding

[Parminder]

> >
> > What gratefulness are we showing to this nomcom, and what message
> > are we
> > giving to the future ones, by chastising it for doing what the group
> > clearly
> > meant it to do... In light of above, I cant support this statement.
> 
> 
> you cannot support support a statement that the next nomcom should
> follow the written  rules and publish its criteria before its makes it
> selections?


Avri, You are asking me to re write the whole email I wrote a little while
earlier, which in view of other members' sensibilities I am unable to.
Parminder 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at psg.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 3:30 PM
> To: Governance Caucus
> Subject: Re: [governance] nomcom's creteria - was multistakeholding
> 
> 
> On 7 Jun 2008, at 02:11, Parminder wrote:
> 
> >
> > What gratefulness are we showing to this nomcom, and what message
> > are we
> > giving to the future ones, by chastising it for doing what the group
> > clearly
> > meant it to do... In light of above, I cant support this statement.
> 
> 
> you cannot support support a statement that the next nomcom should
> follow the written  rules and publish its criteria before its makes it
> selections?
> 
> a.
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance