Remote participation plans Re: [OCDC] Re: [governance] Do

[Avri Doria]

hi,

I am not sure I understand the issue.

The IGF secretariat makes information available on its web site.  In  
understand that some people are comfortable with that web site and  
some people are not.

I don't remember anyone ever telling anyone that they could not  
startup a user participation site of their own.


a.



On 1 Jun 2008, at 22:37, Milton L Mueller wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lee McKnight [mailto:lmcknigh at syr.edu]
>>
>> Ken,
>>
>> The point is the opposite:
>>
>> The 'UN' should NOT be more involved in supporting the community's
> virtual
>> organization.
>>
>
> Right!
> The whole world is atwitter with the peer production phenomenon,  
> (here's
> one of the best and most recent entries: http://isbn.nu/ 
> 978-1594201530 )
> and we know that it bloody well works!
>
> The UN needs to let go enough to allow the repressed energy of the IGF
> community to take up the slack. It simply needs to establish a neutral
> framework for channeling that energy into performance of various
> secretariat functions. The IGF will become much more successful if it
> does so, and the UN will end up looking better.
>
> IGP hinted at this with the "Distributed Secretariat" paper years ago
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance