[governance] voting process - various issues

McTim dogwallah at gmail.com
Tue Jul 29 02:49:18 EDT 2008


On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
>
> If we have political differences it is fine, and we do have them. But lets
> be fair to the list participants, and to ourselves, and not tell them that
> the voting process has been going through such tumult over the past few
> months over a 'tense'.

but it is.  I and Avri/others, want to affirm "AS" we vote (the root
of my previous "zen" comment), you want to have people affirm well
beforehand.

You want to build a list BEFORE the vote, while the charter says; "A
list of the self-defined member-voters will be published after the
election with the results of the election."

all of my objections to your previous proposals stem from the above
differences, as they would not have fulfilled the "affirm membership
on the voter form" clause.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
mctim.blogspot.com
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list