[governance] voting process - various issues

[Parminder]

> > I  understand the meaning of i.e.. but I have listed in detail in my
> note
> > what I considered as the problems associated with taking affirmation on
> the
> > same email on which the vote is cast. I stand by my judgment on it, and
> I am
> > very sure that we would have been in a very bad situation if I had tried
> > such a thing.

> But there have been votes held before in that original manner and no bad
> situation resulted, I don't think...
> Jacqueline


Jacqueline, I can understand that you may not have had time to read my notes
on this issue. They explain everything, including why I couldn't use the
process used the last time, and what is the 'bad situation' I fear if we try
to get membership affirmation on the text of the email on which the vote too
has to be indicated . Parminder 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacqueline A. Morris [mailto:jam at jacquelinemorris.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 8:40 PM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Parminder
> Cc: 'McTim'
> Subject: Re: [governance] voting process - various issues
> 
> Parminder wrote:
> > I  understand the meaning of i.e.. but I have listed in detail in my
> note
> > what I considered as the problems associated with taking affirmation on
> the
> > same email on which the vote is cast. I stand by my judgment on it, and
> I am
> > very sure that we would have been in a very bad situation if I had tried
> > such a thing.
> But there have been votes held before in that original manner and no bad
> situation resulted, I don't think...
> Jacqueline



____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance