[governance] IGC statements

[Carlos Afonso]

Way to go, Parm! I vote Yes, following the vote and endorsing the 
suggestions of Bill Drake.

frt rgds

--c.a.

Parminder wrote:
> Hi Everyone
> 
> Pl find enclosed the proposed caucus statements for the IGF open
> consultations, seeking the group's consensus on them.
> 
> At this stage please indicate A CLEAR YES OR NO to the statements. Added
> explanations etc are fine, but THE 'YES' OR 'NO' TO THE STATEMENTS as
> proposed here (and at this stage unchangeable on any member's suggestions)
> SHOULD BE VERY CLEAR.
> 
> If your response is NO, please also indicate which statement, and if
> possible, which part of it you have specific objection to. This helps in the
> process of calling a possible rough consensus. 
> 
> When you accept such a group statement to be made it may not be exactly the
> statement you will make for yourself, given the choice. However you accept
> that given the prevailing views in the group this statement should be made
> on the behalf of the group. 
> 
> We need a good number of YESes for this statement to go, so pl indicate your
> vote. Numbers also affirm the group's vitality and backing of the work being
> done. 
> 
> Parminder 
> 
>  
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance