[governance] Reconstituting MAG - the missing section

[Ian Peter]

Or maybe this fits better for second sentence and is agreeable? - MtTim if
you like it better I'll include it now in a redraft

We think that as per Tunis Agenda’s multi-stakeholder approach, governments,
civil society and the business sector should be represented equally. 

Then full statement reads

The rules for membership of the MAG, including in terms of representation of
different stakeholders, should be clearly established, and made open along
with due justifications. Full civil society representation is necessary to
ensure legitimacy for this new experiment in global governance.

We think that as per Tunis Agenda’s multi-stakeholder approach, governments,
civil society and the business sector should be represented equally.

We also agree that the organizations having an important role in Internet
administration and the development of Internet-related technical standards
should continue to be represented in the MAG. However, their representation
should not be at the expense of broader civil society participation.



Ian Peter
Ian Peter and Associates Pty Ltd
PO Box 10670 Adelaide St  Brisbane 4000
Australia
Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
www.ianpeter.com
www.internetmark2.org
www.nethistory.info
 

-----Original Message-----
From: McTim [mailto:dogwallah at gmail.com] 
Sent: 23 February 2008 07:03
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Ian Peter
Cc: Adam Peake; Parminder
Subject: Re: [governance] Reconstituting MAG - the missing section

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
> Here's a last attempt at a set of words for the missing section. At this
late stage, rather than commenting generally, as people either suggest
amendments, or express agreement or disagreement? Text follows..

here is my amendment:

>  The rules for membership of the MAG, including in terms of representation
of different stakeholders, should be clearly established, and made open
along with due justifications. Full civil society representation is
necessary to ensure legitimacy for this new experiment in global governance.
>
<2nd para cut>
>
>  We also agree that the organizations having an important role in Internet
administration and the development of Internet-related technical standards
should continue to be represented in the MAG. However, their representation
should not be at the expense of broader civil society participation.

My rationale is that in the 2nd para, we say "only 3 SH's please", but
in the 3rd we'd be saying "let those others in too".

When what we really want to say is "more of us, less of them (gov't reps)"

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
$ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1293 - Release Date: 22/02/2008
09:21
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1293 - Release Date: 22/02/2008
09:21
 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance